Alright, just so that I talk of something that's just tangentially connected to Daenerys. Did R+L=J ultimately have any point other than serving as the seeds for the conflict between Team Essos and Team Westeros? What exactly was the role R'hllor intended for Jon by resurrecting him?
Wrong. I was actively rooting against Dany from the beginning because she was obviously an entitled, looney toon whack.
It appears that the God of Light arranged for Jon to be resurrected so that he could unite the forces to defeat the Night King. Jon is the only one who could've done that. Without those forces, the Night King might well have won quickly enough that Arya wouldn't have had time to figure out what she needed to do or have time to do it!What exactly was the role R'hllor intended for Jon by resurrecting him?
Ain't that the truth. That huge black banner draped over the castle shouted fascist nut job. It was still chilling. At that point, with Drogon, the Unsullied and the Dothraki, she looked almost all powerful.
Still, so many missed opportunities all over. It did seem rushed. I thought there might be, or should have been, a lot of tension and suspense. Especially a showdown with Sansa. Daenerys being heavily guarded. No one can get to her. Arya is walking around in assassin mode.
Her explanation for what she did seemed so short. I thought it would have been the grand masterpiece of explanations. With some logic, insane rambling, political BS, everything.
Something like "I did it for Missandei, Ser Mormont, my two dragons, my brother (though an idiot) who begged so we could survive" "who are you hypocrites to judge me?", things like that.
Idk, it was an awkward finale. Maybe it takes some getting used to.
I get seriously disappointed when a very viable plot device exists to solve a pressing conflict in a story, but it's not leveraged. Like imagine the age-old giant scorpion crossbow used against dragons not employed against ships. Euron did use them, to great effect, decimating so many ships with them. Not using them for that purpose is exactly what I'm talking about.I did mention Arya being saved too. But not sure about the army not being needed. Without the army the dead dudes would have run over winterfell quickly and the Night King wouldn't need to bother going after Bran. That's why the Westros councill of lords thanked Turgo Nudho and the unsullied for saving Westros.
Not for no reason.Daenerys turns pure evil for no reason,
I agree with the story feeling rushed. I also agree with posters who feel that we lost something once the book material was exhausted. But Dany rambling like that would have been out of character--she still believed she was the breaker of chains and she genuinely believed that she had liberated a people even though she massacred everyone in the city. Even though we saw what her actions were, she was blind to it. A tragic flaw. Her story was very Shakespearean, which I believe was Martin's intent.
On another topic, earlier in the thread I expressed a disappointment for Emilia Clark's acting performance this season. After the final three episodes of the season, I take that back. She had some really stunning moments and I loved her in her final scene with Jon.
How is a Starbucks cup much different that a car in the background of a scene in Lord of the Rings? Or contrails in Mad Max? These little mishaps happen in movies.
And that's my main problem with how Daenerys was treated by a considerable part of the audience all along. If you look at what she's done before The Bells, it was ultimately no different from what other villains like Tywin Lannister would've done in her place. She was excessively cruel alright, but always deliberately so and it had a consistent internal logic tied to her misguided sense of justice. And I'm even including her execution of the Tarlys here. They refused to bend the knee and she had every right to execute them, and I'm convinced Tywin or the others would've done the same. In fact, I think Tywin would've had them murdered after they bent the knee because that's the only way to be sure and huge parts of the audience would've cheered him for it because he was just such a cool villain. But for some reason, when it comes to Daenerys, people kept looking for madness in every crime she committed, every time she had a temper and every single decision that made no sense for them, because they knew she was a Targaryen and Targaryens are mad. She was just never given the chance to actually be a proper villain.Not for no reason.
It implied heavily in the series and stated outright in the books that madness runs in the targ bloodline due to inbreeding.
The mad king started off sane aswell.
Chances are Jon will go nuts aswell and become the next nights king.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.