There is a block function. Go to your profile and there is a "people you ignore" tab. Works great.This thread is an example of a forum needing a block function.
The question is, does anyone know what a constitutional anything is? Our modem forms of government came from decades of philosophy and discussions out of the Renaissance and these people are still stuck in the equivalent of the dark ages.
While that would be a satisfying ending emotionally, it doesn't ring true to me. Gendry does not have a strong political base to draw support on. He also seems politically naïve. He would not last long on the throne until someone came and took it away. Don't get me wrong though, the idea is nice.^^^ That is why I am sort of hoping Gendry will take the throne with Davos as his hand - I think that the two of them would be happy to introduce some sort of constitutional monarchy with the king in the end only being a figurehead.
That's a good point. I had forgotten that he was Aerys' first cousin once removed (yeah, I had to look up the exact relation beyond cousins).I don’t see why the Baratheon claim was not legitimate. Before the Rebellion, Robert would have been next in line after Daenerys. There was a good reason why Robert took the throne and not a Stark, a Lannister or an Arryn. However this is not explained in the show.
I don’t see why the Baratheon claim was not legitimate. Before the Rebellion, Robert would have been next in line after Daenerys. There was a good reason why Robert took the throne and not a Stark, a Lannister or an Arryn. However this is not explained in the show.
Worse than the X Files revival?Well, THAT went completely to hell.
Literally.
I reckon Daenerys will go after Sansa next.
It's not a legitimate claim because they're overthrowing the Targaryen dynasty through treason. It muddles things significantly.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.