So from your position, every ship that wasn't seen after 2378 ceased to exist?You realize of course that the last appearance made by a Galaxy-class ship was in 2378 so there's nothing to support your idea onscreen.![]()
So from your position, every ship that wasn't seen after 2378 ceased to exist?You realize of course that the last appearance made by a Galaxy-class ship was in 2378 so there's nothing to support your idea onscreen.![]()
Not my position. Your position. Remember?...So from your position, every ship that wasn't seen after 2378 ceased to exist?
All I’m telling is that you can’t dismiss one proposition on the sole basis of "it’s not supported onscreen" (which is debatable), only to replace with another proposition which is equally not supported by onscreen evidence (and which is definite).there's nothing to support any of those ideas onscreen.
Nice try, but I said nothing of the sort. What I did say, however, was that there was nothing to support your idea that the Galaxy-class was some kind of "lemon."Not my position. Your position. Remember?...
Nah, that's not it. It's just a case that there's no real reason to believe the Galaxy-class was some kind of failure and that Starfleet immediately started planning its replacement after its introduction. What's supported onscreen--and isn't debatable--is that Starfleet obviously felt good enough about the Galaxy-class to build a number of them, with quite a few later participating in the Dominion War. What I did propose, however, was the idea that Starfleet was always introducing new ships and that the Sovereign-class wasn't some consensual proof that the Galaxy-class failed.All I’m telling is that you can’t dismiss one proposition on the sole basis of "it’s not supported onscreen" (which is debatable),
only to replace with another proposition which is equally not supported by onscreen evidence (and which is definite).
Galaxy class is a beautiful design and because it's the main ship in TNG, it just must get into all kinds of trouble, plot demands it sometimes.
Disagree with this notion. As others have said there’s plenty of battle scenes in DS9 where Galaxy Class Ships are leading the charge. Furthmore, throughout the entirety of TNG at least seasons 3-7 whenever there was a standoff Picard seemed as cool as a cucumber I think knowing full well that his ship not only outclassed Rom Warbirds, or Cardie BattleCruisers, etc. There were a few exceptions for instance that Dominion Battleship that smoked the U.S.S. Valiant (a poorly lead Defianf Class ship) most likely in my opinion would be the only enemy ship that would have obliterated a Galaxy Class Ship. Obviously there are these exceptions you’ve pointed out and others such as the initial Bremen assault utterly shi**ing on everything with there pulse cannons. But the beauty of the Federation ships especially the Galaxy Class ships is their resourcefulness and ability to adapt. In the series finale the ship Ritker was commanding took a dump all over those two Klingon future battlecruisers. He made mince meat of them in seconds.The Yamato literally destroyed itself, Odyssey rammed by 1 Jem'Hader ship destoyed, Enterprise-D destroyed by obsolete Klingon Bird or Prey, along with several destroyed during the Dominion War. Not a great record for "The Flagship of the Federation"
Actually, carriers are among the fastest ships in the fleet.
The Galaxy class was not a lemon and I don't think Starfleet built the Sovereign class as a replacement for the Galaxy but for the ageing Excelsior class. The two class's are about the same size although the Sovereign is a lot longer and it even looks like the Sovereign was based on the Excelsior class which makes since it you think about it, the Excelsior was a very successful design but with the age of the Excelsior class Starfleet would need a replacement to take them into the 25th century. If Star Trek was a real thing I don't think there would have been any plan for the Enterprise to ever have been a Sovereign class ship as the Enterprise-D was really still at the beginning of it's life but with it's loss Starfleet took the opportunity to pass the name onto their newest and best ship class. If the Enterprise-D hadn't been lost it's likely the Enterprise-E would have been Odyssey class instead of the Enterprise-F.
If Star Trek was a real thing.
What to do mean if...
The Galaxy-class a lemon and Starfleet knew about it. Not only did SF start planning for its replacement almost immediately after its commission, but the admiralty also had a contingency plan to beef up remaining hulls in the future (or if the Sovereign-class successor wasn’t such a resounding success).
Get a copy of the TNG technical manual and look at the timeframes.
The U.S.S Galaxy was launched nearly 20 years after the project commenced so the fact they started on successor at that point isn't that surprising when it can take so long from initial design to first launch.
Memory-Beta says 2343 for the start of the Galaxy Class Project (prototype launch 2356, commissioned 2357), and 2365 for the Soverign-class project (prototype launch 2370).
So Star Fleet didn't start designing straight after launching the Galaxy class - the Galaxies were in service for 8 years - a time in which there were tehcnical advances, having to deal with damage to subspace, the borg and the dominion.
…Why did Starfleet seek a replacement so soon? Because the Galaxy-class proved to be a lemon.
And you're ignoring the sovereign class were soon supersceded by ships such as the Vesta (Avertine) with Quantum slip stream drive and the Luna classes.
…Why did Starfleet seek a replacement so soon? Because the Galaxy-class proved to be a lemon.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.