Basically, I'd have kept Kirk dead (which would shake things up massively) and Khan surrender to Spock when he realized he'd been outsmarted. (Maybe Spock convinces the Vulcan survivors to take Khan and his people in -- they are both the last of their kind.)
Star Trek III, The Search For Ilia.Yeah, it would change the plots of all the films.
I watched a bit of TWOK the other day. I feels like each time I watch it the Regula 1 stuff becomes more unbearable. It's the most dated-looking and has the worst acting (not a fan of Carol or David). Redo this section and you'd have a much better film.
V
Bill...about hiring that Ferren guy to to the visuals...you might want to re-think that one.
So if Meyer is allowed to say to hell with old fogies who designed TOS then I can say the hell with Nick Meyer.
Spoken like a true "old fogie."
The difference of course being that you are not a respected film director, nor have you worked for Star Trek or any other franchise in any meaningful capacity. Your opinion amounts to that of a fan, not someone involved with the production. That's not to say your opinion isn't valid, just that in the realm of opinions that matter to the production of a film, this one doesn't really communicate much beyond "Waaaaa, they didn't make it the way I wanted them to!"
You never cease to piss me off. I'm entitled to express my opinion and you never miss a chance to comment on it in some disparaging manner or other.So if Meyer is allowed to say to hell with old fogies who designed TOS then I can say the hell with Nick Meyer.
Spoken like a true "old fogie."
The difference of course being that you are not a respected film director, nor have you worked for Star Trek or any other franchise in any meaningful capacity. Your opinion amounts to that of a fan, not someone involved with the production. That's not to say your opinion isn't valid, just that in the realm of opinions that matter to the production of a film, this one doesn't really communicate much beyond "Waaaaa, they didn't make it the way I wanted them to!"
I really am fed up with your shit.
Time for me to reach for the "ignore" button.
The day Warped9 can compose a post about anything that came after Star Trek II that doesn't amount to "Damn kids, get off my lawn!" I'll be happy to redact the "old fogies" remark (which I essentially re-appropriated from his own previous post).![]()
Star Trek III, with the basic plot largely the same with some adjustments to remove some plot holes and strengthen some themes. Just some ideas here and there.
-Kruge and company are Romulans.
Always felt like Kruge's motive (though not his personality) felt more in line with the cold pragmatism of the TOS Romulans than the Klingons. The former trying to get their hands on the Starfleet's superweapon also would be ironic echo of Kirk and company getting their hands on a cloaking device from the Enterprise Incident. That's not even getting into how this could play into the potential exploration of Saavik's mixed ancestry.
-From the beginning, the Federation knows something is off about Genesis.
Morrow would explain to Kirk the Federation is very worried about the early instability they've detected on Genesis, because of the potential fallout that would ensue with the likes of the Romulans and Klingons if the supposedly peaceful terraforming technology of Genesis is revealed to be worthless except as a destroyer of worlds.
This explains why there's nothing but a single science vessel there (because Starfleet is terrified of news of a failed Genesis program leaking out), and make David's use of protomatter actually responsible for many deaths, because had the planet been stable from the beginning, the Federation would have been comfortable sending more ships there and Grissom could never had been destroyed.
-Justify Kirk's trek to Genesis.
Sarek reveals that Spock wanted his knowledge to be preserved and requests Kirk bring McCoy to Vulcan so his son's insights (though his emotions and spiritual katra would be extinguished in the process) can live on. Jim reluctantly agrees until Saavik (who did not go down onto Genesis with David at first) sends him a coded message telling him of Spock's seeming resurrection.
This revelation convinces Kirk to instead try and bring Spock's katra and body together which would both fit his character (getting out of the no win scenario of his friend's spirit being lost forever via unlikely solution) and provide an actual reason for them to disobey Starfleet and go to Genesis.
-Move David's death and make it memorable.
The underplayed, almost casual nature of David's death maybe worked on paper, but fell flat on screen. Add some intensity to the film with the Romulans stabbing David (as motivation to Kirk), but not fatally, with a pained Kirk worried about his son's life and driven to destroy the ship rather than let it fall into Romulan hands.
Kruge beams up all but Kirk, David, and Spock, as he recognizes that the Captain especially values the latter two. Fight scene ensues with the Romulan initially getting the better of Kirk and almost killing Spock and then you have David sacrificing his life to save the Vulcan. Thus in the most personal sense, we get a life for a life, with Marcus as an inventor of Genesis completing his role in giving Spock a new life via his death.
Not only does this had some much needed immediate intensity to the fight with Kruge (though some decent music would help), it gives a chance for a real fallout with a scene of Kirk's grief for David on the trip to Vulcan.
Going off of that perhaps its Saavik unexpectedly providing comfort with her telling him that David sacrificed himself for the same reason Spock did (which goes unsaid, but is clearly not just logic). When Kirk laments he's failed his son like he did Spock, she reminds him that he's only failed if he doesn't honor David's sacrifice and give Spock a chance at rebirth.
"You have faced death admiral. If nothing else; for Spock, for David, face life."
Just a smattering of thoughts as I said, but It wouldn't have minded such changes.
Wow. Someone doesn't care for anime. Fuckin' imagine that. Must be one of only a dozen on the planet.People like him think that Star Trek is meant for them and only for them, but when it's shown that this is not really the case, he gets pissy and thinks that they are 'full of it' for betraying the so-called 'vision' that they think Gene Roddenberry had (his reaction to my idea for an anime Star Trek TV show is illuminating in itself.)
What else is new, though?
Goody for you. Knock yourself out.^How about an audience of millions compared to that of Trekfans? Go to an anime/manga con, look at the number of attendees, the relative youth of said attendees compared to a Star Trek convention, and then get back to me.![]()
^How about an audience of millions compared to that of Trekfans? Go to an anime/manga con, look at the number of attendees, the relative youth of said attendees compared to a Star Trek convention, and then get back to me.![]()
^How about an audience of millions compared to that of Trekfans? Go to an anime/manga con, look at the number of attendees, the relative youth of said attendees compared to a Star Trek convention, and then get back to me.![]()
I'm not against an animated series, though I'm not sure anime is the right style for Star Trek. I say this as someone that's a fan of Space Battleship Yamato.
I'd be willing to accept less that cutting edge animation if combined with a superior story/dialog. The better the story to "worse" the animation.Unfortunately, the animation market won't support quality action/drama animation at the present time.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.