Well if money taken isn't a good indication, has anyone ever tracked actually how many tickets were sold?
Good question. I remember talking about this after the media gushed over how much money Casino Royale made in it's James Bond reboot.
Dollarwise, it made more than any other James Bond film. But, adjusted for inflation it wasn't even in the top 5.
Further, I remember coming across a website at the time that tracked actual ticket sales and Daniel Craig's Casino Royale ended up selling about one TENTH as many seats as some of the early Connery films. I don't remember the exact numbers but you get the point.
Star Trek has done very well dollarwise domestically (keep in mind that Angels and Demons pulled more foreign than Trek has done foreign total). But, since very few box office sources track how many seats are actually sold there is no way to compare it to the Trek movies of the original cast in actual popularity.
Also worth considering is production costs. Star Trek: TMP cost an inflation adjusted $102m to make and grossed over $200m worldwide for a profit of at least $100m.
Star Trek will probably make a similar profit when it's done but will be considered more successful. In the end, TMP will likely have sold far more tickets.
Like I said, nobody really tracks those things any more. All they care about is box office gross.
For comparison sake, I could go see TMP for about $1.50 matinee n 1979. Best I could find for Star Trek was $7 for matinee. So, the ticket prices have increased by a factor of 4.67 while inflation has increased by a factor of 3 or so. In other words, even adjusting for inflation it would take more people seeing TMP to make a profit of $100m than seeing ST.