Indeed. It's amazing it took this long.
Yeah. A few of those movies...yeesh.
Indeed. It's amazing it took this long.
Why do people apologize for having an opinion?
I have been a Star Trek fan since watching "Where No Man Has Gone Before" and playing with Mego figures. I make no apologies for the fact that I do not like TNG and prefer some books over multiple TNG stories any day of the week.
Indeed. It's amazing it took this long.
That actually was addressed in the show. Picard said he would often imagine his mother as an elderly woman offering him tea. I'll admit, in the moment it felt a bit groanworthy, but going back to Where No One Has Gone Before after seeing Picard season 2, I find the scene with his mother is now chilling and haunting, which I feel adds a new dimension to it. Which in retrospect, makes this a retcon that actually does work.
I guess I missed that line. Still, I really didn't care for that entire plot element so it probably wouldn't have helped me see it in a better light regardless. I find it difficult to believe in the 24th century that her mental illness could not have been better treated, that it could get to the point they'd have to lock her in her room to keep her from harming herself.
Sure, it can be treated ... but what if the patient refuses to take her meds?
It happens even today.
It was temporary, as noted in the dialog, until Picard Senior could deal with it.I just have a real hard time buying that in the 24th century they'd have to resort to locking someone in their room to keep them from harming themselves. It might not even be medication. There might be other treatment options, ways to help her, or even just ways to prevent her from harming herself. Locking someone up for something like that just seems very backwards for what we are told is a more enlightened 24th century.
Ah, but remember, we are talking about a man who hated modern technology and modern ways so much he imprinted this hatred onto his older son, resulting in him and his own son getting killed in a preventable fire because he refused to employ modern firefighting and fire detection technologies.I find it difficult to believe in the 24th century that her mental illness could not have been better treated, that it could get to the point they'd have to lock her in her room to keep her from harming herself.
Ah, but remember, we are talking about a man who hated modern technology and modern ways so much he imprinted this hatred onto his older son, resulting in him and his own son getting killed in a preventable fire because he refused to employ modern firefighting and fire detection technologies.
Not "they" in general, the choice of one man.I just have a real hard time buying that in the 24th century they'd have to resort to locking someone in their room to keep them from harming themselves
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.