• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Favorite TAS episodes not named Yesteryear

Here's my favorite (fan-made) full TAS episode.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


:)Spockboy
 
More likely the latter, coupled with Fimation's complete inability to do random fluid animation not intended to be used as stock footage for the next fifty years.

Not complete inability, as they proved in later years. They got better at including rotoscoped, fluid movement sequences, and there were cases where they did fully-animated feature films, a couple of which (Flash Gordon: The Greatest Adventure of All and The Legend of BraveStarr) were pilots for TV series that then recycled a lot of their fluid animation sequences.

I've come to wish that Filmation had done a second animated Trek series in c. 1980-81 as a continuation of ST:TMP. By that point, the quality of their animation and music had improved considerably, and they were beginning to employ some people who'd go on to be big names later on in animation and elsewhere -- Paul Dini, Michael Reaves, Tom Ruegger, Marc Scott Zicree, Rich Fogel, Bruce Timm. (It was still a few years before J. Michael Straczynski came aboard.) There was certainly precedent for Filmation doing a sequel/revival of one of their series; they'd done it with Batman, The Archies, and Fat Albert, as well as reviving the live-action Isis in animation in Freedom Force, and would later do it with Gilligan's Island (as Gilligan's Planet), Shazam (as The Kids' Super Power Hour with Shazam), and The Ghost Busters (as Filmation's Ghostbusters). The diverse multispecies crew glimpsed in TMP would've been a great fit for animation, and a TV series would've expanded on the TMP-era universe and the refit Enterprise in a way the later movies didn't. Plus it would've solidified Filmation Trek as a larger and more integral part of the whole, as well as a better-made part. I would love to live in the parallel universe where this happened.
 
One thing that can be said for TAS is that it allowed, even if in a limited fashion, stories to be visualized in ways TOS was simply unable to do. Even with a better budget and more time allowed 1960's era television resources simply couldn't deliver some of the exotic aliens and elaborate set locales suggested in TOS but actually realized in TAS. A bit more budget for TOS could perhaps have given us some more variation in spaceship deigns and matte paintings, but many of the genuinely cool aliens, locales and ship designs couldn't have been done live-action.
 
...
I've come to wish that Filmation had done a second animated Trek series in c. 1980-81 as a continuation of ST:TMP. ... The diverse multispecies crew glimpsed in TMP would've been a great fit for animation, and a TV series would've expanded on the TMP-era universe and the refit Enterprise in a way the later movies didn't. Plus it would've solidified Filmation Trek as a larger and more integral part of the whole, as well as a better-made part. I would love to live in the parallel universe where this happened.

Agree, I think that TMP-TAS would have been brilliant in 1980-81. As you stated, Filmation already had Flash Gordon animated series 1979-81 in production. TMP animated series would have been exciting to see. In 1979-81, I even collected the Star Trek:TMP based Sunday newspaper comic strips that continued the adventures after TMP in print.
 
I've had my idea about a TMP-era animated series for a couple of years now, but it's only last night that I realized the writing angle, that it could've led to Trek episodes written by Paul Dini. (We did eventually get Trek episodes co-written by Michael Reaves -- TNG: "Where No One Has Gone Before" -- and Marc Scott Zicree -- TNG: "First Contact" and DS9: "Far Beyond the Stars." But they could've gotten their start on Trek far earlier.)
 
I love "The Time Trap", which is responsible for my love of starship graveyards. I'm also very fond of "The Jihad" which is quite an adventure.

Oh, and "Magicks of Megas-Tu", my pick for most batshit crazy episode in the entire franchise.
 
I've always liked "Beyond the Farthest Star" and "More Tribbles, More Troubles."

Kor
 
TAS is by far my second favorite ST series behind TOS. All others fall short for me. TAS had some incredible writers and I can enjoy every episode. I would give a nod to Beyond the Farthest Star if Yesteryear isn't to be considered.
 
I don't care that much for "More Tribbles." It's such a contrived exercise in coincidence to bring the Enterprise, Koloth, Cyrano Jones, tribbles, and a grain shipment together again. TAS has a number of sequels, but none are this slavishly imitative of the original. "Yesteryear" revisits the Guardian of Forever to tell a very different story. "Once Upon a Planet" expanded on elements that had only been implicit in "Shore Leave" and told what was effectively a more meaningful and substantial story (both because there's actual danger rather than the misperception of it, and because the ending actually changes things rather than restoring the status quo). "Mudd's Passion" revisited Harry Mudd's familiar pattern of having "love for sale," but in a very different way than before, and with rock monsters involved. "The Pirates of Orion" took the tidbits "Journey to Babel" had established about the Orions and built a whole different story around them. But "More Tribbles" is just retelling the same story as before. It has a couple of slight tweaks to the formula -- the stasis weapon, the glommer, the tribbles getting huge instead of just multiplying -- but it's a very lazy rehash of an episode that I think was overrated anyway.

It's also inconsistent within itself -- how come the stasis weapon freezes the transporter the first time but not the second? And why does Kirk go ahead and beam the tribbles to the Klingon ship before he delivers his ultimatum? That's not how a threat works! You hold off on using it unless your opponent fails to do what you demand. Since Kirk had already done his worst, the Klingons had nothing to lose by continuing their attack. It just made no sense.
 
But "More Tribbles" is just retelling the same story as before. It has a couple of slight tweaks to the formula -- the stasis weapon, the glommer, the tribbles getting huge instead of just multiplying
I seem to remember reading somewhere that this script had been intended as a sequel if TOS had gone to a fourth season. Something must have changed in the writing however, as how would you have depicted a giant tribble live action? (Unless they did a variation of the model work with cat trick from "Catspaw"?)
 
Something must have changed in the writing however, as how would you have depicted a giant tribble live action? (Unless they did a variation of the model work with cat trick from "Catspaw"?)

Just get a lot of fake fur, stitch it together, and stuff it with foam. If they can make fake boulders and cave walls, a fake giant tribble isn't all that hard, since it's not like it has to move much or has any limbs or facial features. If it needs to move, just have a couple of stagehands roll it. Or maybe stitch the fake fur around a wire frame and have a guy inside to lift it up and walk it forward. Like a fur-suit version of a Doctor Who Mechanoid.
 
Hmmm, I suppose, could have worked. Yes, like the Horta costume in a way!

The model work could have been used for the REALLY big ones in the Klingon engine room!:eek::eek::eek:
 
The steady-state/continuous-creation theory, which was once a competitor to the Big Bang theory. Once Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe was expanding, it suggested that its age was finite, because there must've been a time when it started out infinitely dense. But some scientists, notably Fred Hoyle (who actually coined the term "Big Bang" as a mockery of the rival theory), clung to the idea that the universe was eternal and unchanging (because how could there be anything before existence?), so they concocted the notion that as the universe expanded, new material erupted into being out of white holes in the centers of galaxies (which I think was their explanation for quasars, maybe) and took the place of the matter that expanded away, so that the universe arbitrarily remained at a constant density even though it was expanding. It was a silly idea on the face of it if you ask me, just an arbitrary assumption pulled out of nowhere (fittingly) to avoid discarding a cherished belief. And it had already been largely discredited in the '60s by the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), essentially the residual heat of the Big Bang. But Hoyle and a few others still clung to the steady-state model and handwaved away the CMB, and apparently "Megas-tu" writer Larry Brody was either a believer in steady-state or was a decade or two out of date on his cosmology, because the episode is completely steeped in the idea of continuous creation. And given that subsequent satellite observations of the CMB have put the final nails in the coffin of Hoyle's model, that makes "Megas-tu" about as embarrassing in retrospect as '50s sci-fi stories about the dinosaur-filled jungles of Venus, the canals of Mars, and the solid surface of Jupiter. (Not to mention that later Trek episodes have mentioned the Big Bang as a real thing, even having a Q take Voyager to witness it. Heck, one Trek time-travel novel claims that Scotty and Geordi caused it.)

::Single eyebrow raise:: Fascinating.

Um..Scotty and Geordi caused the Big Bang???? :eek:
 
I believe Gerrold intended "More Tribbles" for the 3rd season, but Freddie F. wasn't a fan of the original "Tribbles"so that was that. Besides, without Coon there to joke it up ("Tribbles" absolutely reeks of his humor) I think a live action episode would have been just as unfunny as the animated one.
 
Besides, without Coon there to joke it up ("Tribbles" absolutely reeks of his humor)
How are you drawing that conclusion? David Gerrold published a book version of "The Trouble With Tribbles" that traced his story from the initial conception and pitch to the final draft script. The story didn't change all that much, and most of the jokes were Gerrold's.

As I recall, the only scenes that were outright added or reworked by Coon were the briefing room scene in the teaser with Chekov (still a very new character when Gerrold was writing his script), and the brief scene with Spock and McCoy examining a Tribble in sickbay. Gerrold took a bit of issue with a Bible-quoting Spock ("They neither reap nor sow") and McCoy's "I like them... Better than I like you," line, which he found a bit too mean.
 
I didn't say Coon wrote it or chunks of it. I am just pointing out that a lot of the humor smacks of Coon. And I know that book you are referencing. To my ear "More Tribbles" doesn't always exhibit a same "voice" in its humor as "Tribbles". This leads me to suspect that a number of those funny lines came from or were tweaked by him. Staff writers often touched scripts, and most of those tweaks went uncredited.
 
Hmmm, I suppose, could have worked. Yes, like the Horta costume in a way!
I wonder if the second season had allowed to continue if they would have done an episode with the Horta. I think they would translate well to animation, maybe even better than the live version.
 
I didn't say Coon wrote it or chunks of it. I am just pointing out that a lot of the humor smacks of Coon. And I know that book you are referencing. To my ear "More Tribbles" doesn't always exhibit a same "voice" in its humor as "Tribbles". This leads me to suspect that a number of those funny lines came from or were tweaked by him. Staff writers often touched scripts, and most of those tweaks went uncredited.
...So you're discounting all the clear documentation about the writing of this episode (much more than we have for most TOS episodes) because you have a feeling? :vulcan: :wtf:
 
...So you're discounting all the clear documentation about the writing of this episode (much more than we have for most TOS episodes) because you have a feeling? :vulcan: :wtf:
For the last time (and seriously, last time), I am saying that TO MY EAR (in case you didn't catch the emphasis in the previous post) the voice of some of the jokey lines smacks of Coon; the same Coon that Gerrold says—in his own book—helped guide him by making suggestions through his agent so he that he could do revisions without being given an official assignment. If you find this completely impossible, so be it, but as to the "documentation" Gerrold's memoir of the writing of his episode would hardly qualify as an objective account.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top