More likely the latter, coupled with Fimation's complete inability to do random fluid animation not intended to be used as stock footage for the next fifty years.
...
I've come to wish that Filmation had done a second animated Trek series in c. 1980-81 as a continuation of ST:TMP. ... The diverse multispecies crew glimpsed in TMP would've been a great fit for animation, and a TV series would've expanded on the TMP-era universe and the refit Enterprise in a way the later movies didn't. Plus it would've solidified Filmation Trek as a larger and more integral part of the whole, as well as a better-made part. I would love to live in the parallel universe where this happened.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that this script had been intended as a sequel if TOS had gone to a fourth season. Something must have changed in the writing however, as how would you have depicted a giant tribble live action? (Unless they did a variation of the model work with cat trick from "Catspaw"?)But "More Tribbles" is just retelling the same story as before. It has a couple of slight tweaks to the formula -- the stasis weapon, the glommer, the tribbles getting huge instead of just multiplying
Something must have changed in the writing however, as how would you have depicted a giant tribble live action? (Unless they did a variation of the model work with cat trick from "Catspaw"?)
Errrr...yeah. I especially like that Chekov is a Russian Edosian.Here's my favorite (fan-made) full TAS episode.
Spockboy
The steady-state/continuous-creation theory, which was once a competitor to the Big Bang theory. Once Edwin Hubble discovered that the universe was expanding, it suggested that its age was finite, because there must've been a time when it started out infinitely dense. But some scientists, notably Fred Hoyle (who actually coined the term "Big Bang" as a mockery of the rival theory), clung to the idea that the universe was eternal and unchanging (because how could there be anything before existence?), so they concocted the notion that as the universe expanded, new material erupted into being out of white holes in the centers of galaxies (which I think was their explanation for quasars, maybe) and took the place of the matter that expanded away, so that the universe arbitrarily remained at a constant density even though it was expanding. It was a silly idea on the face of it if you ask me, just an arbitrary assumption pulled out of nowhere (fittingly) to avoid discarding a cherished belief. And it had already been largely discredited in the '60s by the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), essentially the residual heat of the Big Bang. But Hoyle and a few others still clung to the steady-state model and handwaved away the CMB, and apparently "Megas-tu" writer Larry Brody was either a believer in steady-state or was a decade or two out of date on his cosmology, because the episode is completely steeped in the idea of continuous creation. And given that subsequent satellite observations of the CMB have put the final nails in the coffin of Hoyle's model, that makes "Megas-tu" about as embarrassing in retrospect as '50s sci-fi stories about the dinosaur-filled jungles of Venus, the canals of Mars, and the solid surface of Jupiter. (Not to mention that later Trek episodes have mentioned the Big Bang as a real thing, even having a Q take Voyager to witness it. Heck, one Trek time-travel novel claims that Scotty and Geordi caused it.)
How are you drawing that conclusion? David Gerrold published a book version of "The Trouble With Tribbles" that traced his story from the initial conception and pitch to the final draft script. The story didn't change all that much, and most of the jokes were Gerrold's.Besides, without Coon there to joke it up ("Tribbles" absolutely reeks of his humor)
I wonder if the second season had allowed to continue if they would have done an episode with the Horta. I think they would translate well to animation, maybe even better than the live version.Hmmm, I suppose, could have worked. Yes, like the Horta costume in a way!
...So you're discounting all the clear documentation about the writing of this episode (much more than we have for most TOS episodes) because you have a feeling?I didn't say Coon wrote it or chunks of it. I am just pointing out that a lot of the humor smacks of Coon. And I know that book you are referencing. To my ear "More Tribbles" doesn't always exhibit a same "voice" in its humor as "Tribbles". This leads me to suspect that a number of those funny lines came from or were tweaked by him. Staff writers often touched scripts, and most of those tweaks went uncredited.
For the last time (and seriously, last time), I am saying that TO MY EAR (in case you didn't catch the emphasis in the previous post) the voice of some of the jokey lines smacks of Coon; the same Coon that Gerrold says—in his own book—helped guide him by making suggestions through his agent so he that he could do revisions without being given an official assignment. If you find this completely impossible, so be it, but as to the "documentation" Gerrold's memoir of the writing of his episode would hardly qualify as an objective account....So you're discounting all the clear documentation about the writing of this episode (much more than we have for most TOS episodes) because you have a feeling?![]()
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.