Mario - some would argue that it's a canon model display, nothing more. YMMV and for me that's far too simplistic an explanation for anything Star Trek!![]()
I heartily agree with thatFor myself, I'm content to sit back admire Tobias Richter's beautiful work![]()
And I guess I just leave it at that, lest this thread also gets closed ...
For myself, I'm content to sit back admire Tobias Richter's beautiful work![]()
I heartily agree with that![]()
The vocal opponents had severe issues with a possible "canon" status of the Probert design, so this "non-canon" thread title should adequately appease them, I think.
You have your own view of the Trek universe and that's great (we all do), ...
... but you seem to take it as an insult that we all don't bow down to your interpretations.
I suppose my favorite non-canon ship is the Phase II Enterprise designed by Matt Jefferies.
Probert's version of the Enterprise-C is certainly the more elegant, but the version shown in "Yesterday's Enterprise" is by definition the canonical version of the ship.
The Phase 2 Enterprise's pylons always looked incomplete to me, in that the lines suddenly took a 45 degree turn up near the nacelles.
Other than that, it represented a far more believable "upgrade" to the original TOS-E
It looks more like a helmet than the head of a bird, but it surely is a very interesting variation of the Probert design (maybe I'm influenced by retroactive nuBSG thinking where Cylon helmets had become the bow of Cylon vessels).
The 90s computer game Star Trek: New Worlds had a design for a TMP-era Romulan warbird in it's intro video (the Melak), though I think it looks more appropriate for the 24th century rather than the 23rd. I could easily see a couple of these slugging it out with the Ent-C.
![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.