I'm not being sarcastic or asking this to be rude, but is English your second language, or do you something that makes it hard for you to judge things like writing and acting? I only ask this because you seem to have very different opinions and ideas about these kind of things than most other people, even professionals in the industry. I've seen you come into threads about some of the most beloved and acclaimed series and movies of the last decade, which have been considered very well written and acted, and have won practically every award in the industry for those categories, and talk about how horrible the acting and writing are. It's honestly starting to feel a little strange how you seem to consistently contradict 99% of people who watch, and I'm just wondering if there is a reason.
EDITED: To add not to beginning of post.
Well considering the fact that I'm an American born in the US who only speaks one language, and its the one I'm currently typing in, I can say with certainty that English is my first and only language. I just don't go along with a general opinion if I disagree with it. Shitty programs/movies/etc win awards all the time. and TV snobs love fawning over rancid shit as long as it hits the standard "prestige TV" bullet points. Now Fallout, as bad as it is, doesn't seem to hit enough "Prestige TV" bullet points to justify its fans being so defensive about it, so all I can guess is that its costuming and prop departments are so good people just ignore the fact that its writing is just absolute shit. I personally don't think seeing stuff that is comparable to what talented cosplayers have been doing for years is worth ignoring the shows numerous problems, but thats just me.
If you use awards to justify a shows quality, you really need a different metric. I don't care if anyone agrees with me or not when it comes to my opinions on shows, but "winning an award" means literally nothing in regards to something's quality. Crappy things have won emmys/oscars/etc and amazing things have won nothing, the standards for giving awards are capricious and influenced by any number of factors not related to quality.
I like plenty of popular things, but I also disagree with film/tv snobs about basically everything. I also hold adaptations/spinoffs of properties I like to a much higher standard on average then most people seem to. If something disrespects the property, especially because the producers/writers/showrunner seem to just be using the property for their own purposes, I'm going to call it out. On the other hand, a lesser quality show that I think is at least trying its hardest I'll give a lot of leeway to. For example, I like Rings of Power a lot even though its almost hilariously incompetent when it comes to actually following Tolkien's lore, but it feels more like a product of its rights situation then active malevolence by the showrunners, unlike shows like The Witcher, Andor or Fallout which feel like they are made by people who for some reason (probably money) chose to work on them despite actively seeming to hate their franchises.