Can we think of any sensible reasons one would hide a big massive starship under the water instead of you know, IN SPACE? Sure the reason it's in the movie is because it looks cool, but has anyone come up with an actual reason they would do that?
Which would make sense since they probably needed seismological data from the site anyway and being closer to the ground could provide that.The other option is they'd have to submerge the ship farther away, then travel as a submarine closer to shore.
#genesvision"We're the Federation. We don't use cloaking devices. That would be beneath us, for some reason."
"We're the Federation. We don't use cloaking devices. That would be beneath us, for some reason."
I've always wondered how they did it. You couldn't just drop in directly from above, as the ship would be easily noticed
and if you moved too quickly you'd cause flooding on the mainland (although those cliffs were quite high). The other option is they'd have to submerge the ship farther away, then travel as a submarine closer to shore.
And nobody complained.F. King Daniel said:See also, Star Trek: Insurrection where a village sized ship was hidden underwater
The specific purpose of going underwater?It wasn’t village sized, it was a fraction of the size of the JJ Prise, plus it was cloaked and designed for that specific purpose.
And if it wasn't village-sized, how would the holodeck illusion work if the villagers wanted to be at different ends of the village?
The why is to circumvent the volcanic cloud, while allowing an escape from the natives without revealing the Enterprise.Its not the going under water that’s the problem it’s the why.
Why did it have to hide underwater especially if it had a cloaking device?Because the Holodeck is magic technology. Yes it was designed for the duck blind mission.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.