• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Everything you know is wrong! (but actually isn't)

Just because it's impossible to achieve it absolutely doesn't mean you should just be lazy and not even try.
You may be the first person in history to call Grant Morrison "lazy." Congrats.

That's not what I was referring to. A poster made a comment to the effect that consistency in storytelling didn't matter. I'd stopped thinking about Morrison by that point; I finished that conversation a couple of days ago, as far as I'm concerned. I was merely conveying my objections to the general philosophy implied in that post.





I realize that for you, Christopher, Batman taking up a gun and shooting Darkseid crosses some sort of line. I and Admiral Young have tried valiantly to explain to you what happened and why it happened, and we've both said that the best thing for you isn't to judge the story blindly but to read it for yourself. And to be frank, that disappoints me, that in spite of your own standards of truth and logic, you've chosen to rail against the idea on hearsay (though accurate hearsay) rather than educate yourself.

I freely admit that my feelings about guns are irrational. I've told you that I have a deeply personal reason for hating them. So please try to show me a little sensitivity. I'm still mourning my father's passing last month -- please don't browbeat me on an attitude that arises from my grief at a tragedy far earlier in my life. Please, please, just drop it and leave me alone.
 
No one is browbeating you...if this was so personal to you then it probably would have been a good idea to refrain from commenting on the subject, especially if you had no desire to be enlightened in the first place. I'm also sorry for your loss.
 
I'm certainly not browbeating you. I'm just discussing a fictional character and having a good time doing it. I like that you disagree. It gives me something to think about.

And I'm certainly sorry about your father.
 
If Batman has to sink to using Joe Chill's methods, then Batman becomes a failure.

I'm sure that the families of every single victim of the Joker will tell you that Batman has always been a failure.

Batman isn't a hero. He is a rich psychopath who gets his rocks off by playing games of cat and mouse with dangerous criminals and he doesn't really care who gets hurt by his playmates just so long as he gets to play with them.

He uses his absurdly strict moral code as a flimsy justification, but the fact of the matter is that if he got rid of his rouges gallery then he wouldn't be able to dress up like a bat and have fun anymore.
 
That's an interesting take...certainly not unique, I've heard it before many times from non Batman fans. Bruce failing at his mission and not upholding his oath to his parents to avenge them and make sure no one else suffers what he did is something that eats at him constantly. It is his very reason for existing. Bruce Wayne would be a waste of a man if he wasn't Batman. One could argue that it is his destiny to become Batman. Ultimately whatever view you have of him, the story of Batman is one of tragedy. Then again this isn't a Batman thread.
 
Oh, and this isn't comics, but I've just gotta mention it: The Warp 5 Limit in Star Trek.

According to the Star Trek Encyclopedia, the assumption is that later starships like the Defiant & Voyager were outfitted with more advanced, environmentally friendly warp drives that could travel at higher speeds without damaging subspace.

Reading Geoff Johns' Green Lantern is like reading what Winston Smith would have written after his face almost got chewed off by rats.

I have no idea who Winston Smith is. And yet, this is one of the funniest things I've read on here in months. Proving once again that Myasishchev is the funniest TrekBBS poster ever! (Except for maybe MadBaggins, but he's unintentional.)

I always thought that if you were forced to learn the Anti-Life Equation, you stopped caring about your life to the extent that you'd do whatever Darkseid told you.

I think that if you were forced to learn the Anti-Life Equation, you would stop caring about your life and start arguing about comic book continuity on the internet.:p
 
Oh, and this isn't comics, but I've just gotta mention it: The Warp 5 Limit in Star Trek.

According to the Star Trek Encyclopedia, the assumption is that later starships like the Defiant & Voyager were outfitted with more advanced, environmentally friendly warp drives that could travel at higher speeds without damaging subspace.

Oh, I know... but it's still handwaving away something that should have rocked the Star Trek universe to its core-- and instead, had no impact on any of the shows. Hell, when Voyager had "The Omega Directive", they could have tied it in with "Force of Nature" very easily. I really thought they would. :rolleyes:

Reading Geoff Johns' Green Lantern is like reading what Winston Smith would have written after his face almost got chewed off by rats.

I have no idea who Winston Smith is. And yet, this is one of the funniest things I've read on here in months. Proving once again that Myasishchev is the funniest TrekBBS poster ever!

True, but it's funnier if you read "Nineteen Eighty-Four".

I think that if you were forced to learn the Anti-Life Equation, you would stop caring about your life and start arguing about comic book continuity on the internet.:p

Aha! We've isolated one factor of the Anti-Life Equation. Mathematically, it's rendered as www.trekbbs.com.
 
I'm suddenly reminded of that stupid ass ending to X-Files Season Four where that guy shockingly revealed that there were no aliens and everything was a lie so Mulder committed suicide... right before they filmed the movie featuring aliens starring Mulder :rollseyes:
 
Oh, and this isn't comics, but I've just gotta mention it: The Warp 5 Limit in Star Trek.

According to the Star Trek Encyclopedia, the assumption is that later starships like the Defiant & Voyager were outfitted with more advanced, environmentally friendly warp drives that could travel at higher speeds without damaging subspace.

Oh, I know... but it's still handwaving away something that should have rocked the Star Trek universe to its core-- and instead, had no impact on any of the shows. Hell, when Voyager had "The Omega Directive", they could have tied it in with "Force of Nature" very easily. I really thought they would. :rolleyes:

Considering "Force of Nature" was an incredibly lame, preachy episode, I don't mind ignoring it. (The same way I'm also glad they never did sequels to "Masks" or "Sub Rosa.")
 
If Batman has to sink to using Joe Chill's methods, then Batman becomes a failure.

I'm sure that the families of every single victim of the Joker will tell you that Batman has always been a failure.

Batman isn't a hero. He is a rich psychopath who gets his rocks off by playing games of cat and mouse with dangerous criminals and he doesn't really care who gets hurt by his playmates just so long as he gets to play with them.

He uses his absurdly strict moral code as a flimsy justification, but the fact of the matter is that if he got rid of his rouges gallery then he wouldn't be able to dress up like a bat and have fun anymore.

Personally, I prefer Batman stories where there's a difference between him and the villains he fights. Otherwise, what the hell's the point?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top