The Earth-Romulan War was 2155-2160, yet he already said is was "ten years before Kirk" which is 2223 at the least, ten years before his birth.
So somewhere from 2155-2223, that narrows it down...well not at all.
Bryan Fuller retweeted a tweet that seems to confirm the show takes place during a klingon/federation war https://twitter.com/screenjunkies/status/763543385932042240
The Earth-Romulan War was 2155-2160, yet he already said is was "ten years before Kirk" which is 2223 at the least, ten years before his birth.
So somewhere from 2155-2223, that narrows it down...well not at all.
Agreed. Trek writers have a real hard on for the Klingons; I think they're a deeply clichéd warrior race trope. Now they may have originally been a founding example of this trope, but it is now tired. But given that there is potentially a Klingon main character I think we'd better suck it up. The Klingons are in this, and likely playing a big part.I am so sick of hostilities with the Klingons. Let's get away from that. There are other baddies out there.
Agreed. Trek writers have a real hard on for the Klingons; I think they're a deeply clichéd warrior race trope. Now they may have originally been a founding example of this trope, but it is now tired. But given that there is potentially a Klingon main character I think we'd better suck it up. The Klingons are in this, and likely playing a big part.
But an expedition is a military maneuver.
I thought he said ten years before the five year mission?
I've been seeing any number of contradictory statements across all the threads, not helping clarify things like that. But someone quoted him as saying it was "close" to the Romulan War, and now he's saying it's ten years before 2263?
That's still 2160-2243, assuming the person who quoted him on the Romulan War remark got it right to start with.
This is why we needed a full on reboot.
Nonsense. Magellan, Columbus, Lewis and Clark, or Apollo 11. Are you saying those weren't 'expeditions?'
TOS was an action/adventure series with some portents of an evolved society with exploration being present as well. I don't have a problem with action/adventure. I don't have a problem with shooting phasers. I think you need some of those moments because if its just exploration, people are going to tune out.
What I do have a problem with is the same old villain time and time again. The Klingons have remained THE baddy in Star Trek since 1966. Hell, even when the Klingons and the Federation were at peace, there were moments of conflict. I fully expect those moments of conflict to continue into Discovery. Let's just not make them THE baddy. That's all I'm saying.
Nonsense. The British contribution to WWI was an expedition; so were its imperialistic designs on Egypt, Mesopotamia and India. Are you saying those weren't 'expeditions'?
The Vulcanian Expedition could be either sort. But since an expedition can be a military maneuver, and there's nothing to explore on Vulcan (or in other words, our TOS heroes still know nothing of Vulcan), the military sort sounds the likelier one.
As for 'Klingon War', the sneak peek at what will eventually be the Discovery shows a heavily and prominently armed vessel; Kirk's guns were invisible. The Discovery being all muscle would fit thematically.
Timo Saloniemi
Exactly. An expedition is an organized journey for a particular purpose as of war or exploration. And Vulcanian doesn't necessarily mean on the planet Vulcan, only that Vulcans are somehow involved.The Vulcanian Expedition could be either sort. But since an expedition can be a military maneuver, and there's nothing to explore on Vulcan (or in other words, our TOS heroes still know nothing of Vulcan), the military sort sounds the likelier one.
I'm not sure why you keep assuming that the name 'vulcanian' automatically means it must be an expedition to Vulcan. It could be to anywhere for anything. As long as it in someway involves the Vulcans in large enough numbers or an important enough role to justify naming it after them.
And, here's the problem with a prequel. If it's set during the cold war, any plots that attempt to deal with the tensions and possibility of a hot war emerging won't work because we'll know that it can't.The Federation and Klingons were in a cold war setting with skirmishes and proxy battles etc. I didn't think the two sides ever had a full scale war?
This highlights another drawback of it being a prequel. The fact that this is set in that time frame really limits the potential number of major hostile alien races. Sure, you can have one-off stories with the alien villain of the week. But, in terms of species that regularly affect the power dynamic in the region, you're very limited in this time frame. It pretty much has to be the Klingons. So, it makes sense they have cast these characters.Agreed. Trek writers have a real hard on for the Klingons; I think they're a deeply clichéd warrior race trope. Now they may have originally been a founding example of this trope, but it is now tired. But given that there is potentially a Klingon main character I think we'd better suck it up. The Klingons are in this, and likely playing a big part.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.