And this is why authors should not be allowed to title their own books!
I've titled every one of my books and stories to date with the exception of
Mere Anarchy: The Darkness Drops Again, which was a theme title assigned by our editor KRAD. Although there have been several cases where my initial proposed title was rejected and I went back and forth with Marco until I thought of one we were both okay with. (
Orion's Hounds was originally
Spirit of the Hunt;
Spider-Man: Drowned in Thunder was tentatively titled
Lying Vanities;
Places of Exile was tentatively titled
The Other Side of the River, which I never liked anyway; and "As Others See Us" was originally "Duck Blinds," and came very close to being called "How Not to Be Seen.")
What I find interesting is that the Enterprise crew in "Space Seed" express admiration for Khan and describe his reign as being relatively peaceful and benign, and note that there were no massacres under him. Yet the EW books show that there was significant conflict between Khan's forces and the civilian population, and that he did in fact have some insurgents killed. I don't think Kirk and co would've found that particularly admirable.
Well, "relatively" is the key word. He was a dictator, but not nearly as bad as all the other eugenics supermen who conquered other parts of the world. And a massacre is an indiscriminate mass killing, a bloodbath (it comes from the French for "slaughterhouse"), so having "some insurgents" killed probably wouldn't be large-scale or indiscriminate enough to fit the definition.