You know I've never been able to get much solid information on Scott's work on the project. Just that sets were being built and only one draft of the script had been done (which is a red flag, in and of itself) when Ridley jumped ship; partly it seems because he didn't like how the script departed from the source material, coupled with the fact that dealing with de Laurentiis as a producer was a bit of a headache, but mostly because of the death of his brother.IMO Jodorowski's Dune would have been horrendous, as would have been Ridley Scott's.
(my pet peeve are the Weirding Modules but only because they missed the big opportunity for some action scenes instead of just shooting some unique weapons).
Pretty sure I've gone into this before somewhere up thread, back in the mists of time; but my general notion regarding the weirding modules was that they simply didn't know how to make the weirding way seem special enough as to give a major advantage over what's supposed to be the universe's most elite of elite warriors. So "special sound weapon" is just much easier to portray cinematically.What i am thinking about sometimes is why some fans of the novel are so vivid about Lynch's version and what the differences that truly matter are and i can only come up with one - the ending itself where it was insinuated that Paul could make it actually rain.
Now to be fair - no movie adaptation could match any book that is the size of Dune with its multilayered themes. Much of what is nonessential to the bare plot (which i have described in this thread a while ago) was cut and i understand it even if i may not like the decision (my pet peeve are the Weirding Modules but only because they missed the big opportunity for some action scenes instead of just shooting some unique weapons).
I like Lynch's version for the most part, especially the visual design and to me it's a serviceable version of a quite complicated book when you get into the details.
What do you think?
Not soon enough damnit!WB has confirmed the trailer will be online at 9am PST SEP. 9th.
This is the trailer, not the teaser that will premiere in Theatres Only with Tenet on Aug 31 which the leaked images are from.
Combined covers
![]()
Josh Brolin teases DUNE. “We are all so proud of this film as it slowly creeps its way to the masses. This is another era begun. Another level of filmmaking. Back to an emotional landscape that gladiators imagination can conjure. This is the beginning of a whole new awe.”
I would love for it to be that, but there have been other movies where people involved have said stuff like that, and then it just ended up being more of the same.
But Denis Villeneuve is one person I actually think could pull something like that off.
No. The less I'm reminded of Thanos the better.Anyone read that in Thano's voice? Especially the very end?
Actually, let's not because it proves your point. Jackson didn't want to direct the Hobbit films and ended up doing so anyway. I think in the process he lost sight of what made the Hobbit distinct from LOTR and allowed mission creep to happen.let's forget The Hobbit movies
Agreed on both counts. I do wonder how much of it was Jackson and how much it was the studio to split the film into three films, thus unnecessarily forcing the parallel to the first trilogy. I know Jackson loves his battle sequences and look no further than changing Helm's Deep from a simple incursion to a massive climatic battle (but at least it functions well on most counts). But the high percentage of the third was an obscene amount of fighting that wasn't even depicted in the boo (because Bilbo to the knock on the head early on).Actually, let's not because it proves your point. Jackson didn't want to direct the Hobbit films and ended up doing so anyway. I think in the process he lost sight of what made the Hobbit distinct from LOTR and allowed mission creep to happen.
I said ever since the third film came out that deeply buried in the trilogy is an excellent adaptation of the novel. I've watched a couple of fan edits and I've been proven right. It's pretty damn remarkable how much of the fat easily slides off when the focus is right. Even the unnecessary side plot with Azog disappears without any notice and I was pleasantly surprised that was true for even the "Out of the Frying Pan and Into the Fire" sequence that was horribly bogged down (but there's no fixing the stupid situation with the tree). The only part that's really choppy is the Beorn sequence.Though, I'm one of the few people who finds some good in those films, despite the overlong and unnecessary secondary storylines.
As you say finding the right fan edit can do wonders. My wife is a huge LOTR fan (writes fan fiction) and has created her own fan edit where she knows the sequences of the films she wants to watch to structure the story in a way that both makes sense and ignores the side stuff. SO, watching the films with her is rather fun because she has done that edit, just hasn't edited it all together, if that makes sense.So yeah, there's quite a bit of good in the trilogy but it's hard to see it clearly because of all of the excessive side stuff.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.