Remind me, what happened on that day? I know the 11th had some crazy shit going on, but I don't recall anything of note happening on the 10th.the world is simply a different place than it was in 1965 (or September 10th, 2001).
Remind me, what happened on that day? I know the 11th had some crazy shit going on, but I don't recall anything of note happening on the 10th.the world is simply a different place than it was in 1965 (or September 10th, 2001).
It's just now occurring to me that that some people here are under the impression that Paul is the hero of this story. He's the protagonist; not necessarily the same thing. Indeed, there's an entirely valid argument to be made for Paul being the book's primary villain, not the Baron.
While he is partly the victim of outside forces, he's also the person that created a universe consuming monster that he couldn't control and is primarily motivated by a combination of revenge, hatred, a need to control & dominate, and resentment towards those that sought to control him. His blood relation to the Baron wasn't just put in there for the hell of it. It explicitly underlines the reality that he's as much of a Harkonnen as he is an Atredies.
From what I remember of the book, I don't see where it would be that much of a problem to just change the word Jihad to something with less baggage. Unless they want to actually want to address that and leave it in on purpose as a way to challenge people who have a problem with it.
I really don't see what all the fuss is about. The word jihad appears like a dozen or so times throughout the whole book. It's not really central to the plot and mostly only dropped in passing. And even if it was, so what? I don't get how this is such a sensitive subject. I mean no more than the word "crusade", which really has *way* more historical baggage attached.
What a bunch of racist neocon assholes feels about Muslims or Islam should have no affect on this movie, and hopefully, won't do so (and if the neocons are so triggered by the word jihad, they can stay home and not go to see either of the movies.)
the world is simply a different place than it was in 1965 (or September 10th, 2001).
Remind me, what happened on that day? I know the 11th had some crazy shit going on, but I don't recall anything of note happening on the 10th.
Remind me, what happened on that day? I know the 11th had some crazy shit going on, but I don't recall anything of note happening on the 10th.
From what I remember of the book, I don't see where it would be that much of a problem to just change the word Jihad to something with less baggage. Unless they want to actually want to address that and leave it in on purpose as a way to challenge people who have a problem with it.
While I mostly hope the word is retained, I don't quite think this is fair. Quick Google of jihadist gets me this top news story:
'Sahel leaders meet as jihadist attackers kill 14’ – Business Day
That's today, and it's not an isolated incident. You can talk about how 'jihad' has multiple meanings, but fact is people who call themselves jihadists or are labelled so by the media have been killing a lot of people lately.
I still don't care about what a bunch of racist morons think about the word or Islam, and neither should the production company, distribution company, producer, director, script writer, or actors. That they (and you) are concerned says something about them and you,and it isn't nice.
I was just thinking how depressing the future of society depicted in Dune is, given that a feudal system ruled over by warlords with private armies appears to be pretty much the norm.
Jihad? Seriously, people?
How about Buddislam? Zenshiism? Mahayana Christianity? Oh, this one is good: Orange Catholic Bible.
Just look at this list:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Dune_religions
Ok, let's open the book.Yeah, but then this:
Now ask your average Citizen Joe, what he thinks about Jihad, you probably get the very some answer - "something like Hitler".
It depends on the presentation.Thereby, movie about unspeakable crimes of Jihadists in Space will be warmly received by general audience. It's exactly what they expect to see.
The problem is that for the vast, vast majority of average Americans, the one and only time they ever hear the word jihad is in relation to Muslim terrorists and you really don't want the hero of you big sci-fi blockbuster to be associated with groups like ISIS and the Taliban. And for most people context isn't going to matter, they're just going hear jihad and freak out.
Obi-Wan Kenobi?And the context is desert dwellers who live in caves throwing off a foreign oppressor under the leadership of their prophet...
Here's a concept I've been working on: how about we don't pander to narrow minded morons who throw hissy fits every time the universe refuses to conform to their ignorant preconceptions?The problem is that for the vast, vast majority of average Americans, the one and only time they ever hear the word jihad is in relation to Muslim terrorists and you really don't want the hero of you big sci-fi blockbuster to be associated with groups like ISIS and the Taliban. And for most people context isn't going to matter, they're just going hear jihad and freak out.
This isn't some tiny little indy that can get away with just making money from intelligent, open minded people, this is going to be a big blockbuster that is going to be trying to get as many butts in the seats as possible, even the butts of clueless idiots.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.