• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Dune 2018 (19,20,21...)

It's just now occurring to me that that some people here are under the impression that Paul is the hero of this story. He's the protagonist; not necessarily the same thing. Indeed, there's an entirely valid argument to be made for Paul being the book's primary villain, not the Baron.

While he is partly the victim of outside forces, he's also the person that created a universe consuming monster that he couldn't control and is primarily motivated by a combination of revenge, hatred, a need to control & dominate, and resentment towards those that sought to control him. His blood relation to the Baron wasn't just put in there for the hell of it. It explicitly underlines the reality that he's as much of a Harkonnen as he is an Atredies.

IMHO, Paul is at best an antihero, in that he's acting to liberate the Fremen and also free the galaxy from the just-as-bad tyranny of House Corrino, as well as avenge the destruction of House Atredies, the deaths of Leto, Liet Kynes, and the enslavement/death of Thufir Hawat by House Harkonnen; if anything, the plotting by House Corinno and House Harkonnen (as well as the plotting of the Bene Gesserit to get his mom to help create the Kwizach Haderach) to destroy the Atredies drove him to do what he does at the end of the novel and help create the feared jihad in question, much as what was said in the script for the original ending of the 1984 movie previously mentioned in this thread, and also had similarities with what Dominic Vernius was going to do in recent for what happened to his House in the prequel novels, in that both men were driven to do what they did due to how the Emperor and the Landsrrad wrecked (allowed to be wrecked in the case of the Landsrrad) both houses (one man-Vernius-failed, and the other-Paul Atredies-succeeded.)

From what I remember of the book, I don't see where it would be that much of a problem to just change the word Jihad to something with less baggage. Unless they want to actually want to address that and leave it in on purpose as a way to challenge people who have a problem with it.

What a bunch of racist neocon assholes feels about Muslims or Islam should have no affect on this movie, and hopefully, won't do so (and if the neocons are so triggered by the word jihad, they can stay home and not go to see either of the movies.)
 
Last edited:
One synonym for jihad would be "harrying", as in "the Harrying of the North" undertaken by William the Conqueror. The word crusade would cause as many problems as jihad and would be probably be inappropriate for devotees of the Zensunni religion. However, "harrying" does sound more than a bit silly.

"Scourging" is another possibility but it doesn't seem quite right.

"Cleansing" is the best I can come up with as there is a contemporary association with "social cleansing".
 
I really don't see what all the fuss is about. The word jihad appears like a dozen or so times throughout the whole book. It's not really central to the plot and mostly only dropped in passing. And even if it was, so what? I don't get how this is such a sensitive subject. I mean no more than the word "crusade", which really has *way* more historical baggage attached.

Well.. us fans can be anal about such details :)

The term in Dune applies mainly to Paul's conquest of the known human realm starting with the second book and it was a central theme onwards, it doesn't apply much in the original novel.

However what do you think would the reaction be in certain areas when they see brown people engaging in a Jihad and fighting/defeating white people all over the universe and showing them as a superior fighting force?

I can guarantee you there will be tons of stupid crap from anti-muslim groups up to accusing Hollywood to have the dream of muslims taking over the world (yes, people in our era are especially stupid).

I don't believe it will be something of a problem for these movies though.
 
What a bunch of racist neocon assholes feels about Muslims or Islam should have no affect on this movie, and hopefully, won't do so (and if the neocons are so triggered by the word jihad, they can stay home and not go to see either of the movies.)

While I mostly hope the word is retained, I don't quite think this is fair. Quick Google of jihadist gets me this top news story:

'Sahel leaders meet as jihadist attackers kill 14’ – Business Day

That's today, and it's not an isolated incident. You can talk about how 'jihad' has multiple meanings, but fact is people who call themselves jihadists or are labelled so by the media have been killing a lot of people lately.
 
the world is simply a different place than it was in 1965 (or September 10th, 2001).

Remind me, what happened on that day? I know the 11th had some crazy shit going on, but I don't recall anything of note happening on the 10th.

I think that's the very point he's making. The word 'jihad' makes a FAR different - and far more fear-inducing - impression on the average American mind from September 11, 2001 onward than it did on September 10th. Call it triggering if you want, but... well, FPAlpha above sums it up for me.
 
Remind me, what happened on that day? I know the 11th had some crazy shit going on, but I don't recall anything of note happening on the 10th.

I actually missed this. Not sure if you didn't get the point, thought I made a mistake, or were simply making a joke. In any case, post above pretty much covers it.
 
From what I remember of the book, I don't see where it would be that much of a problem to just change the word Jihad to something with less baggage. Unless they want to actually want to address that and leave it in on purpose as a way to challenge people who have a problem with it.

What a bunch of racist neocon assholes feels about Muslims or Islam should have no affect on this movie, and hopefully, won't do so (and if the neocons are so triggered by the word jihad, they can stay home and not go to see either of the movies.)
While I mostly hope the word is retained, I don't quite think this is fair. Quick Google of jihadist gets me this top news story:

'Sahel leaders meet as jihadist attackers kill 14’ – Business Day

That's today, and it's not an isolated incident. You can talk about how 'jihad' has multiple meanings, but fact is people who call themselves jihadists or are labelled so by the media have been killing a lot of people lately.

I still don't care about what a bunch of racist morons think about the word or Islam, and neither should the production company, distribution company, producer, director, script writer, or actors. That they (and you) are concerned says something about them and you,and it isn't nice.
 
I still don't care about what a bunch of racist morons think about the word or Islam, and neither should the production company, distribution company, producer, director, script writer, or actors. That they (and you) are concerned says something about them and you,and it isn't nice.

What's that then?
 
Yeah, but then this:
Ok, let's open the book.

Quote:

" There's another emperor I want you to note in passing -- a Hitler. He killed more than six million. Pretty good for those
days."
"Killed . . . by his legions?" Stilgar asked.
"Yes."
"Not very impressive statistics, m'Lord."

"Very good, Stil." Paul glanced at the reels in Korba's hands. Korba stood with them as though he wished he could drop them and flee. "Statistics: at a conservative estimate, I've killed sixty-one billion,
sterilized ninety planets, completely demoralized five hundred others. I've wiped out the followers of forty religions which had existed since -- "
"Unbelievers!" Korba protested. "Unbelievers all!"
"No," Paul said. "Believers."
"My Liege makes a joke," Korba said, voice trembling. "The Jihad has brought ten thousand worlds into the shining light of -- "
"Into the darkness," Paul said. "We'll be a hundred generations recovering from Muad'dib's Jihad. I find it hard to imagine that anyone will ever surpass this."

Unquote.

You see, those Space Jihadists from the Future openly compared to Hitler himself. They are even worse than Hitler - 61 billion victims! 90 planets! Can you imagine that?!

Now ask your average Citizen Joe, what he thinks about Jihad, you probably get the very some answer - "something like Hitler".

Thereby, movie about unspeakable crimes of Jihadists in Space will be warmly received by general audience. It's exactly what they expect to see.

So, nothing to worry about.

/S
 
That's from Dune Messiah, no?

Also:

Now ask your average Citizen Joe, what he thinks about Jihad, you probably get the very some answer - "something like Hitler".

I doubt it. I imagine most people would say something about Islamic terrorism.
 
The problem is that for the vast, vast majority of average Americans, the one and only time they ever hear the word jihad is in relation to Muslim terrorists and you really don't want the hero of you big sci-fi blockbuster to be associated with groups like ISIS and the Taliban. And for most people context isn't going to matter, they're just going hear jihad and freak out.
This isn't some tiny little indy that can get away with just making money from intelligent, open minded people, this is going to be a big blockbuster that is going to be trying to get as many butts in the seats as possible, even the butts of clueless idiots.
 
The problem is that for the vast, vast majority of average Americans, the one and only time they ever hear the word jihad is in relation to Muslim terrorists and you really don't want the hero of you big sci-fi blockbuster to be associated with groups like ISIS and the Taliban. And for most people context isn't going to matter, they're just going hear jihad and freak out.

And the context is desert dwellers who live in caves throwing off a foreign oppressor under the leadership of their prophet...
 
The problem is that for the vast, vast majority of average Americans, the one and only time they ever hear the word jihad is in relation to Muslim terrorists and you really don't want the hero of you big sci-fi blockbuster to be associated with groups like ISIS and the Taliban. And for most people context isn't going to matter, they're just going hear jihad and freak out.
This isn't some tiny little indy that can get away with just making money from intelligent, open minded people, this is going to be a big blockbuster that is going to be trying to get as many butts in the seats as possible, even the butts of clueless idiots.
Here's a concept I've been working on: how about we don't pander to narrow minded morons who throw hissy fits every time the universe refuses to conform to their ignorant preconceptions?
Just a thought....

And while we're having thoughts, here's another one: how many of these people do you expect to show up to a cerebral, hard sci-fi movie directed by a very artsy director with a tendency to go for slow burn, introspective, avant-garde storytelling?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top