(I understand the subject of my post has probably been discussed ad nauseam for years but I'm a new member who has never used social media before.)
My Trek has always been TOS and TNG. I've adored these shows for over 30 (my God!) years. Around a dozen years ago I watched DS9. I was floored. What a show! I couldn't believe it had taken me so long to get to it. So much so that I considered it my favorite. That station was a second home!
Then I went through a very intense period in which TNG and TOS basically began to inform my life to an insane degree. It became nothing short of a religion or a philosophy to live by. Without really realizing it, I was becoming a Star Trek purist.
When I've returned to DS9, I see a show that deviated from what Trek is. I see a show that deals with themes like terrorism, war, and religion. I get it: Trek can take many different forms. It's underlying message can still come through in episodes like "Duet" or "In The Pale Moonlight". But I can't help thinking that Roddenberry would have disapproved. Sisko lies and deceives. He was unhonest. Then the war with the Dominion. I love TNG for its optimism and peaceful nature. It's a comfort. And DS9 remains a comfort as well but differently. It's hard to explain and I must sound a bit crazy. I'm really not.
What do people think? How does DS9 fit into Roddenberrys vision?
Are my feelings relatable?
My Trek has always been TOS and TNG. I've adored these shows for over 30 (my God!) years. Around a dozen years ago I watched DS9. I was floored. What a show! I couldn't believe it had taken me so long to get to it. So much so that I considered it my favorite. That station was a second home!
Then I went through a very intense period in which TNG and TOS basically began to inform my life to an insane degree. It became nothing short of a religion or a philosophy to live by. Without really realizing it, I was becoming a Star Trek purist.
When I've returned to DS9, I see a show that deviated from what Trek is. I see a show that deals with themes like terrorism, war, and religion. I get it: Trek can take many different forms. It's underlying message can still come through in episodes like "Duet" or "In The Pale Moonlight". But I can't help thinking that Roddenberry would have disapproved. Sisko lies and deceives. He was unhonest. Then the war with the Dominion. I love TNG for its optimism and peaceful nature. It's a comfort. And DS9 remains a comfort as well but differently. It's hard to explain and I must sound a bit crazy. I'm really not.
What do people think? How does DS9 fit into Roddenberrys vision?
Are my feelings relatable?