Ive been looking forward to your interview with Alex White. Thanks for posting it here.![]()
My biggest problem with the book is actually a me-problem, not a book problem: If Nemi was so influential on Jadzia at such a harrowing time of her life, why is it that we've never heard her mentioned before? Of course, the reason why is her character hadn't been thought up at the time we saw Jadzia in Deep Space Nine, but those types of "inconsistencies" do sometimes take me out of the story. Again, that's a me-problem and I can eventually get back in the "groove".
Plus it got meta and played on Farrell's sensitive skin. I imagine otherwise she may have gone undercover in one of the Klingon episodes or something.I do have to say that I loved the idea of Jadzia going undercover as a Vulcan. I would love to see Terry Farrell playing Jadzia attempting to impersonate a Vulcan. I think the author did a good job of bringing her mischievous mannerisms through in that scene.
Plus it got meta and played on Farrell's sensitive skin. I imagine otherwise she may have gone undercover in one of the Klingon episodes or something.
Oh, I enjoy them for what they are as well. I'm sorry if I wasn't clear in my original post. I want to be clear that I'm not blaming the author at all. It is, obviously, the nature of tie-in literature that they can describe events that would never be referenced in canon. I get it. It's just a foible I have that my mind gos to those sort of thoughts. I eventually work through it though.I reckon if you've been in the relaunch continuity (splinter one, or whatever it is now) the contents of novels occurring in-series is something that takes a minute to get your head back into. As I recall, TNG had over 30 numbered novels released during the show run and over 60 by the time we got to the relaunch. There were some pretty darn significant things that occurred during those novels that you'd think somebody would mention, and of course later episodes that contradicted stuff.. The one-shot episodes are particularly prone to it. Even moreso when we think that, for example, a Dax could show up in any of the TV shows currently airing (past, present or future if you consider the 24th century to be your reference point).
But then these one shots don't purport to be a major singular continuity, as the relaunch was. It was a unique project that came about due to Trek being at a place in time and with a lack of ongoing onscreen production. I enjoy these novels for what they are, and actually they make a touchpoint to go back and watch the episodes in question. And I don't mind sitting in my seat and dealing with the potential contradiction of Ezri sorting out a murder investigation without reference to the events of this novel, written several decades later. It's all good, and I loved the book enough to get me back to those episodes.
It is, obviously, the nature of tie-in literature that they can describe events that would never be referenced in canon.
In an interview, Alex White mentioned that they would be interested in doing another, but that they were working on a series right now. I hope they get invited back!Great review I've really like this book alot the details of the Trill society and the mystery Jadzia unravels about her previous hosts is really complex. I hope Alex White will write another Ds9 novel someday.
I hope he does get invited back. I really like how he wrote the Ds9 characters.Being a big ds9 showed through out the book.
Yes, Alex came out as non-binary and uses they/them. It’s like a breath of fresh air to have some LGBTQIA+ representation amongst the Trek novelists.Not a criticism, but just letting you know for future reference: I believe Alex White uses they/them pronouns.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.