Sounds too much like a Data moment....
Yeah, but this would've taken place in the 60s.
Besides, everyone knows Data is a Spock clone anyway.






Sounds too much like a Data moment....
I'm not crazy about the term, either, but it shows there's some desire for something that covers beards, mustaches, beard-mustache combo, sideburns etc. without getting into specifics. There's no single word that can be used that way, so we're left with "facial hair."
I think if someone left his mustache contrary to intent, the expected reiteration would be something like, "Shave it all off."I'm not crazy about the term, either, but it shows there's some desire for something that covers beards, mustaches, beard-mustache combo, sideburns etc. without getting into specifics. There's no single word that can be used that way, so we're left with "facial hair."
Actually, if you told a man with a full beard he had to shave his beard, do you think most men would not consider the mustache part and parcel of that order... the wiseacres aside? Just curious.
I'm not crazy about the term, either, but it shows there's some desire for something that covers beards, mustaches, beard-mustache combo, sideburns etc. without getting into specifics. There's no single word that can be used that way, so we're left with "facial hair."
Actually, if you told a man with a full beard he had to shave his beard, do you think most men would not consider the mustache part and parcel of that order... the wiseacres aside? Just curious.
Actually, if you told a man with a full beard he had to shave his beard, do you think most men would not consider the mustache part and parcel of that order... the wiseacres aside? Just curious.
I have no problem with the term. But I do wonder at what point sideburns stop being included as part of cranial hair (there's a euphemism for ya) and officially become "facial"?It's easier to say "facial hair" than it is to say "mustaches, beards, goatees, etc." It was mentioned in reference to all facial hair (er...mustaches, beards, goatees, etc.) in the military and likewise in Starfleet.
No Hitler 'taches.Yes, within the regulations.Are military personnel currently serving allowed to have facial hair?
I have no problem with the term. But I do wonder at what point sideburns stop being included as part of cranial hair (there's a euphemism for ya) and officially become "facial"?.
Sounds too much like a Data moment....
Maurice said:"Beard", generally speaking, means, all of the hair on the lower part of the face, except maybe the stache. "Goatee", "muttonchops", etc. are styles created by shaving off parts of the beard. You're still shaving off your beard if you shave off your goatee, just as you're shaving off your hair when you shave off a mohawk.
I think Doohan in TOS cut quite an imposing figure physically and he was very believeable as a guy you didn't screw with in those instances when he took command of the Enterprise.
In the film when they put him in the engineering suit and his mustache he just looked like a kind of flustered middle age guy who hated his job and wanted to buy a ferrarri and find a 22 year old hardbody with big tits.
Didn't Doohan actually marry a 18 year old fan a couple of years earlier?![]()
Shantner's moustache in his second Columbo episode is one of the most extrodinary things you will ever see. Over the course of the episode it grows and shrinks and changes colour and once you notice it doing that it becomes impossible to pay attention to anything else (there's also one scene where Peter Falk's hair is dyed much much darker than it is in the rest of the movie, the whole thing feels as if- for whatever reason- they filmed some of it a while after the bulk had been shot).
I am angry about the terminology for facial hair!!!!!!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.