Still ugly, though.FWIW, trending colors for 2019 include oranges and greens that would be right at home in Mike and Carol's kitchen. What was old is new again.![]()

Still ugly, though.FWIW, trending colors for 2019 include oranges and greens that would be right at home in Mike and Carol's kitchen. What was old is new again.![]()
The Voyager warp core was inspired by the one from TMP (I suspect our Production designer liked the look), and IIRC the lighting effect was achieved in a similar way - a slightly frosted tube, rotating lights, mirrors, and a ton of poly fluff to diffuse the light. - RickRick Sternbach could answer that, but I agree, it looked like it was mostly illuminated jets of smoke.
I suspect polyester fiber fill?What is "poly fluff"?
That's hilarious, Voyagers warp core was filled with pillow stuffing.
It's altogether a really nice set. It's obviously predominantly the same as the TNG set, but manages to look like a much busier place. I get that the TNG set had to double up a corridor with the various plugs they could put in, but Voyager really benefited from widening the set and installing more consoles along the sides. Plus the expanded upper level, even though we didn't see it much.I think that the Voyager warp core looked spectacular. The Motion Picture's looks great, too, though.
I suspect it would be assumed that any exposed engine elements would be shielded enough as to not make a big deal to be around. Which is why the reactor room that Spock entered in TWOK was so significant.
For the same reason starships can magically stop on a moments notice or can jump to FTL speeds without the crew disintegrating: the drama of a TV show requires the sacrifice of scientific plausibility; forget about accuracy.Yeah, but the simplest form of radiation shielding is distance, and the simplest form of heat shielding is vacuum. And good engineering is about keeping it simple. It's just good sense to keep the engines and the habitat section of a starship in separate modules with a fair amount of distance between them (which is why 2001's Discovery has such a long, long middle section between the inhabited sphere at the front and the nuclear engines in the back).
Considering that the TNG crew fire phasers all around engineering all the time - VOY too, for that matter - the assumption is that the delicate-looking machinery in the center of it all is considerably more durable, and shielded, than it's initial appearance would suggest.
I didn't catch that from the earlier comment, sorry.Again, I'm not talking about rationalizing what they did. I'm trying to encourage speculation: if they had gone for a more realistic design that kept the actual engine well away from any inhabited section of the ship, what could they have done in terms of engine room set design that would still have been visually interesting?
Except for that one stray phaser shot that put a hole in the transporter control casing in The Enemy Within:Considering that the TNG crew fire phasers all around engineering all the time - VOY too, for that matter - the assumption is that the delicate-looking machinery in the center of it all is considerably more durable, and shielded, than it's initial appearance would suggest.
Rule of Plot, my friend.Except for that one stray phaser shot that put a hole in the transporter control casing in The Enemy Within:
SCOTT: Mister Scott, sir, on the lower level of the Engineering deck. I've found a new trouble with the transporter. The casing has a wide gap ripped in it. The main circuits have been burned through. The abort control circuit is gone altogether...Yes, phasers and engineering don't mix. Good thing Scotty moved that exposed line out of the way. In Season 2, the transporter control circuits were moved up into the Emergency Manual Monitor Room.
SCOTT: The transporter unit ioniser. Nothing much left of it, sir.
KIRK: How bad is it?
SCOTT: We can't repair it in less than a week.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.