http://www.scifiheaven.net/index.php/2009/04/10/dollhouse-cancellation-mystery-thickens/
Cancellation not so certain after all? Who knows at this stage.
Cancellation not so certain after all? Who knows at this stage.
Why couldn't TNG be good for the first 3 seasons? Why did Star Trek fans always have to "wait for 3 season" for the shows to find their feet? Why do networks have to mess with shows and "improve" them?This is the problem right here. Why couldn't the show have been good to begin with? Why should any audience be expected to wait for something to maybe start getting good?
The "talent" don't make shows in a vacuum they more often than not have to bend to the will of the execs. I'm not saying that's an excuse for poor shows all the time, but there has been a noticable improvement of Dollhouse since they got to the "untampered" episodes.
TNG's first two seasons were among the worst TV ever aired, Star Trek or otherwise. It did not deserve to continue but it did. That's the way it goes. I have no doubt that whether or not Dollhouse was good or not would have made a difference in it being canceled or renewed. All I was referring to was the idea that some fans, for some reason, are willing to invest their time into mediocrity. Network-tampered mediocrity, but mediocrity nonetheless If something isn't good, for whatever reason it may be, and people recognize that it isn't good, then why should it be allowed to run?
Why couldn't TNG be good for the first 3 seasons? Why did Star Trek fans always have to "wait for 3 season" for the shows to find their feet? Why do networks have to mess with shows and "improve" them?
The "talent" don't make shows in a vacuum they more often than not have to bend to the will of the execs. I'm not saying that's an excuse for poor shows all the time, but there has been a noticable improvement of Dollhouse since they got to the "untampered" episodes.
TNG's first two seasons were among the worst TV ever aired, Star Trek or otherwise. It did not deserve to continue but it did. That's the way it goes. I have no doubt that whether or not Dollhouse was good or not would have made a difference in it being canceled or renewed. All I was referring to was the idea that some fans, for some reason, are willing to invest their time into mediocrity. Network-tampered mediocrity, but mediocrity nonetheless If something isn't good, for whatever reason it may be, and people recognize that it isn't good, then why should it be allowed to run?
TNG is a different case though. It was one of very, very, very few genre shows on TV at the time so naturally any and all genre fans were going to watch it. It was also not on network TV. It was basically on what was free air time that most networks didn't use. So they were only accountable to the producers, not any network. That TV time all got bought up with the creation of CW, UPN, and The WB sadly. It also had one of the biggest name brands and one of the biggets cult followings around. So, no matter how bad the writing could potentially be, they were in a win/win situation.
Why should Joss blame himself?
For the crap premise, the crap scripts and the crap lead actress?
I'm a big Whedon fan but crap this statement is arrogant.Talking about this sort of thing to folks who don't like Whedon is just like trying to discuss music with the tone deaf - pointless and a waste of time that could be spent on music.![]()
Why should Joss blame himself?
For the crap premise, the crap scripts and the crap lead actress?
Amen to the last one. Eliza Dushku might be nice to look at but she's up there with Milo Ventimiglia and Hayden Panettiere in acting ability. Watching any of them try to emote is literally painful.
I'm a big Whedon fan but crap this statement is arrogant.Talking about this sort of thing to folks who don't like Whedon is just like trying to discuss music with the tone deaf - pointless and a waste of time that could be spent on music.![]()
Didn't he just do this as a favor to Eliza Dushku, after they came up with the idea over lunch (or something like that)?
Ah, thank you. I didn't know the whole story.Depends on which end of the telescope you look through - it can easily be said that Dushku was doing Whedon a favor. FOX approached her wanting to develop a new TV series around her, and she went to Whedon to create it for her. As others have pointed out, he was doing a whole lot of writing comic books at the time.Didn't he just do this as a favor to Eliza Dushku, after they came up with the idea over lunch (or something like that)?
Talking about this sort of thing to folks who like Whedon is just like trying to discuss polka music with the people who actually have TASTE in music - pointless and a waste of time because polka ain't really music![]()
Oh well. I guess Saint Joss isn't infallible and has to return to the realm of comics where his flock, in between denouncing the rest of us for not appreciating his "genius", will buy every issue of his books. So very sad.
But the zealous Whedonites will never admit that their god has feet of clay.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.