Surely you've got to define it by producing new episodes every year, otherwise you'd be saying that I Love Lucy has been on the air for sixty years despite its star being dead for over twenty years.Well yes, but no one is claiming that Doctor Who has been on the air for forty-eight years, just that it's forty-eight years old. Whereas whoever was speaking about Red Dwarf seems to have been claiming that the series had been on the air for 25 years, which obviously it hasn't.So DW, aside from a single TV Movie had what 16 years off the air.
Depends how you define it. With worldwide audiences I doubt a year's gone by where it hasn't been shown somewhere. One could argue it's been on air 25 years by default that it's never been off air. He still gets royalty cheques. Its just spent more years out of production than in it.
I'm pretty sure that for a substantial proportion of A Good Man Goes To War's filming, Barrowman was in Wales filming scenes for a UK/US co-production whose name escapes me.I definitely agree with that, RTD probably got out at the right time, since he had basically used up everything he could for his usually plot devices.
Moffat though, everything just falls flat. I always compare his Good Man bollocks to Journeys End, getting together a bunch of people we don't give a shit about? Imagine they did that in Journeys End, the episode would've ultimately fell flat. That's what the entire run has felt like to me, constantly falling flat due to little build up.
Except Journey's End had four entire seasons (six, in Jack's case) to build up those characters, plus one of the doctor's previous companions from twenty years ago. You don't get the same kind of buildup with just a season and a half of character development.
And the good Captain was supposed to be in A Good Man Goes to War (rather handy in a battle, not staying dead) but Barrowman was off filming something in the US...
