Do you like the *NEW* NCC-1701? Simple Yes or No.

[RAMA]

Get a grip people!

[image of ship]

Thats just rude. Must we keep seeing that thing?

Yes! I'm hoping reality hits you smack between the eyes.

 

[ELURIA]

Oh hell no !

Tiss ugly.

 

[C.E. Evans]

I can only vote "Yes" if this movie is meant to be a genuine reboot of TOS so we can forget about everything that came before it.

Otherwise...

 

[Sci]

By now we have all seen the Big E. The question remains though, do you like it? No reason needs to be given for your choice, but you are more than welcome to do so. Just an unscientific poll to see if the majority likes it or not.

I hate it. But that doesn't mean it won't be a good movie!

 

[BenRoethig]

For the most part yes, but the cutaway section of the main hull needs to start at the beginning of of the nacelle pylon and the neck needs to be moved forward. For the most part, it looks like a very believable design for a starship 100 years after the NX-01.

 

[Santaman]

No.. eww..

 

[number6]

Undecided.

 

[Inquisitive]

For!

I like the design changes, which are mostly focused on form rather than function. It still has a primary hull connected via strut to the secondary hull with two nacelles protruding from the secondary hull. Overall the design reminds me of a mixing the old (hot rod styling of Deflector and Nacelles), with the design elements of the 23rd Century according to Star Trek.

 

[Ptrope]

Knee-jerk reaction (and vote): No. Maybe in motion, maybe on the big screen, but I'll still take Vektor's Enterprise over this one. It reminds me of 1701-D, which I've never liked ...

 

[JuanBolio]

No... I can't say I LIKE it. I don't totally dislike it yet either.

 

[CommanderRaytas]

Hell yeah!

 

[Q2UnME]

Knee-jerk reaction (and vote): No. Maybe in motion, maybe on the big screen, but I'll still take Vektor's Enterprise over this one. It reminds me of 1701-D, which I've never liked ...

Same here. Voted "no". Just can't help thinking that the secondary hull is too small and the "neck" should be brought forward. Proportions are wrong....

Q2UnME

 

[Samuel T. Cogley]

I'm still in my chambers, mulling it over. I'll give you my verdict in May.

 

[TK421]

I'm still in my chambers, mulling it over. I'll give you my verdict in may.

As I've said before, I hate the new Batmobile, but love Dark Knight/Batman Begins.

Maybe I'll grow to love this, but either way it won't affect if I like the movie or not.

The thing looks like a parody though.

 

[Admiral Buzzkill]

I do like it, but with vague reservations - I have no list, short or long, of specific ways that I want it to be different. I think I'm kind of with Montgomery Burns from "The Simpsons:"

I don't know art, but I do know what I hate. And I don't hate this."

 

[ManOnTheWave]

New day. New dawn.



Yup.

 

[judge alba]

have to say nope dont like it i think what i dont like is the necks too far from the deflector dish.
it just seems out of the era for me mind you i should haveeapected something like this after 'enterprise' came out

 

[Sci]

The more I think about it, the more I've decided the only thing I really, truly hate are the Bussard collectors. They ought to be round and glowing red, goddamnit.

 

[EnsignYoshi]

I got mixed feelings. In one way I like it but in another way I don't cause it looks way way too much like the TMP-era enterprise. And why would starfleet build a ship, then "downgrade" it's appearance, only to give it a almost similarlooking appearance again (I assume that's how the most starship sites are going to explain the difference). Also the deflector seems to stick out too far (though this could be because of the ship covering the complete sight).

I would have liked to see more TOS-trademarks in here. For this reason I voted No.

 

[Blip]

Hell no.