If all the above is correct, then Discovery is no more a violation of “prime” than anything post First Contact (the movie). Therefore, all the handwringing over “prime” is moot.It would be easier with diagrams, yeah, but these forums doesn't really accommodate that. FWIW, though, Cultcross has it right. Let me take a crack at explaining...
In FC, the present day is 2273, yes. But that's not when the time alteration takes place. It takes place in 2063. It's correct to say that events pre-2273 as we originally saw them would be set in the unaltered timeline. However, any depictions of the timeline after FC (including not just events post-2273, but flashbacks to earlier events post-2063, such as "TATV" (to the events of "Pegasus" in 2371) and indeed the entire ENT series) would be to the reconstructed timeline, which is similar to but not a perfect match for the original.
Here, let's see if I can manage a quick-and-dirty diagram after all (hmm, tricky, the forum doesn't seem to like empty spaces)...
2063 --Timeline A --------TOS-------TNG----FC
_________________________________________/ /
/ Borg incursion
= Timeline B -----------------------------------> /
________________________________________/
/ Ent crew incursion
= Timeline C ----ENT-----TOS-------TNG---2273------->
In Timeline A, Cochrane had no interference with his warp experiment in 2063, and things proceeded as we saw on screen up to FC. In Timeline B, the Borg prevented Cochrane's experiment and assimilated Earth (and the only reason the Ent-D was able to see the effects of this in 2273 and follow them back is because of Data's technobabble about how "We appear to be caught in a temporal wake... [that] must somehow have protected us from the changes in the time-line"). In Timeline C, Cochrane got an assist, and every event from 2063 forward was (presumably) similar to but (potentially) different from what we'd actually seen on screen. (At the very least, there were Borg buried in the Arctic, which couldn't have been true in Timeline A. By my hypothesis, the rest of ENT in its entirety is also an alteration.)
No disagreement with you about any of this, FWIW. I don't think the Borg retcons were as problematic as CrazyEddie proposes.
Get out of here with that heresy!If all the above is correct, then Discovery is no more a violation of “prime” than anything post First Contact (the movie). Therefore, all the handwringing over “prime” is moot.![]()
The silly thing that annoys me most is things like micheal using a communication as a universal translator when , "10 years later" its a completely different piece of eguipment. I spptted a few things, but maybe im being picky
Whoops. You are, of course, correct. Too darn easy a mistake to make without noticing.2373. Not 2273.
FC takes place in 2373. TMP takes place in 2273.![]()
For whatever it's worth, the change that the communicator is the translator is one of several carried over from Enterprise.The silly thing that annoys me most is things like micheal using a communication as a universal translator when , "10 years later" its a completely different piece of eguipment. I spptted a few things, but maybe im being picky
Well, it certainly highlights that as far as timelines go, Trek has been all over the map since at least City on the Edge of Forever. Minor changes, major changes (see Endgame or The Visitor), 'corrections' that weren't quite the same but got the job done, all sorts of things creating a maze of divergent timelines. The fact that so few have a noticeable effect after the fact is something of an argument for fate...If all the above is correct, then Discovery is no more a violation of “prime” than anything post First Contact (the movie). Therefore, all the handwringing over “prime” is moot.![]()
The UT was an attachment for the communicator, at least in early episodesFor whatever it's worth, the change that the communicator is the translator is one of several carried over from Enterprise.
In Archer's time, it was a separate device.The UT was an attachment for the communicator, at least in early episodes
it attached to the Communicator (well the communicator attached to it)In Archer's time, it was a separate device.
For whatever it's worth, the change that the communicator is the translator is one of several carried over from Enterprise.
So Lorca was more correct than he knew?Well, it certainly highlights that as far as timelines go, Trek has been all over the map since at least City on the Edge of Forever. Minor changes, major changes (see Endgame or The Visitor), 'corrections' that weren't quite the same but got the job done, all sorts of things creating a maze of divergent timelines. The fact that so few have a noticeable effect after the fact is something of an argument for fate...
Star Trek is really about Klingons.But if this thread taught me anything it's that whatever Enterprise changed/retconned (like cloaking tech already existing for Suliban / Xyrillian / Romulan / etc) doesn't actually count... unless it's about Klingon forehead viruses, that's the only one that really matters!
Her's was an upgrade.The silly thing that annoys me most is things like micheal using a communication as a universal translator when , "10 years later" its a completely different piece of eguipment. I spptted a few things, but maybe im being picky
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.