• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Poll Do you consider Discovery to truly be in the Prime Timeline at this point?

Is it?

  • Yes, that's the official word and it still fits

    Votes: 194 44.7%
  • Yes, but it's borderline at this point

    Votes: 44 10.1%
  • No, there's just too many inconsistencies

    Votes: 147 33.9%
  • I don't care about continuity, just the show's quality

    Votes: 49 11.3%

  • Total voters
    434
Let's quote Seven about this:

"Fun will now commence"

I think timeline alterations are only acceptable if they're counterbalanced with an equal amount of fun.
 
It would be easier with diagrams, yeah, but these forums doesn't really accommodate that. FWIW, though, Cultcross has it right. Let me take a crack at explaining...



In FC, the present day is 2273, yes. But that's not when the time alteration takes place. It takes place in 2063. It's correct to say that events pre-2273 as we originally saw them would be set in the unaltered timeline. However, any depictions of the timeline after FC (including not just events post-2273, but flashbacks to earlier events post-2063, such as "TATV" (to the events of "Pegasus" in 2371) and indeed the entire ENT series) would be to the reconstructed timeline, which is similar to but not a perfect match for the original.

Here, let's see if I can manage a quick-and-dirty diagram after all (hmm, tricky, the forum doesn't seem to like empty spaces)...

2063 --Timeline A --------TOS-------TNG----FC
_________________________________________/ /
/ Borg incursion
= Timeline B -----------------------------------> /
________________________________________/
/ Ent crew incursion
= Timeline C ----ENT-----TOS-------TNG---2273------->

In Timeline A, Cochrane had no interference with his warp experiment in 2063, and things proceeded as we saw on screen up to FC. In Timeline B, the Borg prevented Cochrane's experiment and assimilated Earth (and the only reason the Ent-D was able to see the effects of this in 2273 and follow them back is because of Data's technobabble about how "We appear to be caught in a temporal wake... [that] must somehow have protected us from the changes in the time-line"). In Timeline C, Cochrane got an assist, and every event from 2063 forward was (presumably) similar to but (potentially) different from what we'd actually seen on screen. (At the very least, there were Borg buried in the Arctic, which couldn't have been true in Timeline A. By my hypothesis, the rest of ENT in its entirety is also an alteration.)


No disagreement with you about any of this, FWIW. I don't think the Borg retcons were as problematic as CrazyEddie proposes.
If all the above is correct, then Discovery is no more a violation of “prime” than anything post First Contact (the movie). Therefore, all the handwringing over “prime” is moot. :whistle:
 
Well, technically, "prime" was a term only coined c. 2009, to distinguish the then-primary Trek timeline from the alternate reality of the new Abrams films. Presumably, then, if there's any ambiguity, "prime" should designate Trek's status quo reality as of post-ENT, pre-Abrams. Whether or not DSC fits in with that is not, admittedly, necessarily the same question as whether it fits in with TOS and TNG as we remember them.
 
The silly thing that annoys me most is things like micheal using a communication as a universal translator when , "10 years later" its a completely different piece of eguipment. I spptted a few things, but maybe im being picky
 
The silly thing that annoys me most is things like micheal using a communication as a universal translator when , "10 years later" its a completely different piece of eguipment. I spptted a few things, but maybe im being picky

It's also a different piece of equipment in the 24th century, at least with some alien races. Many Ferengi have Universal Translators implanted in their ears that are sometimes prone to malfunctioning, as Quark, Rom and Nog momentarily believe in "Little Green Men(DS9)."
 
The silly thing that annoys me most is things like micheal using a communication as a universal translator when , "10 years later" its a completely different piece of eguipment. I spptted a few things, but maybe im being picky
For whatever it's worth, the change that the communicator is the translator is one of several carried over from Enterprise.
 
If all the above is correct, then Discovery is no more a violation of “prime” than anything post First Contact (the movie). Therefore, all the handwringing over “prime” is moot. :whistle:
Well, it certainly highlights that as far as timelines go, Trek has been all over the map since at least City on the Edge of Forever. Minor changes, major changes (see Endgame or The Visitor), 'corrections' that weren't quite the same but got the job done, all sorts of things creating a maze of divergent timelines. The fact that so few have a noticeable effect after the fact is something of an argument for fate...
 
By this point in history Linguacode software is in use by Starfleet and can be incorporated into both shipboard communications systems and handheld devices. Hoshi invented Linguacode later in her life and the program has probably been used aboard starships for many years by the time DSC rolls around, and for all we know the handheld Universal Translator seen in "Metamorphosis(TOS)" could well have used Linguacode to interpret the Companion's thought transmissions.
 
For whatever it's worth, the change that the communicator is the translator is one of several carried over from Enterprise.

But if this thread taught me anything it's that whatever Enterprise changed/retconned (like cloaking tech already existing for Suliban / Xyrillian / Romulan / etc) doesn't actually count... unless it's about Klingon forehead viruses, that's the only one that really matters!
 
Well, it certainly highlights that as far as timelines go, Trek has been all over the map since at least City on the Edge of Forever. Minor changes, major changes (see Endgame or The Visitor), 'corrections' that weren't quite the same but got the job done, all sorts of things creating a maze of divergent timelines. The fact that so few have a noticeable effect after the fact is something of an argument for fate...
So Lorca was more correct than he knew? ;)

My own view of Trek time travel is that just about every time “our heroes fix things”, they really end up in a new branch (à la 09) but very similar to the original. As we follow the characters, and they don’t seem to notice, neither do we. In 09, the perspective shifted enough so that we did notice.

The advantage of my interpretation of Trek time travel is how it eliminates 99% of “canon (really continuity) violations”. Does wonders for my blood pressure. :lol:
 
But if this thread taught me anything it's that whatever Enterprise changed/retconned (like cloaking tech already existing for Suliban / Xyrillian / Romulan / etc) doesn't actually count... unless it's about Klingon forehead viruses, that's the only one that really matters!
Star Trek is really about Klingons.
 
I have to admit i wasnt a big fan of ds9 or voyager. Wasnt a fan of berman. But at least the uniforms were close enough to be consistant.. i cant help but think we will see pike in a blue discovery uniform in the season opener of discovery..
 
The silly thing that annoys me most is things like micheal using a communication as a universal translator when , "10 years later" its a completely different piece of eguipment. I spptted a few things, but maybe im being picky
Her's was an upgrade.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top