Interesting. Got any images or links you can share to illustrate how Yamato did this? (I don't really feel like going down the rabbit hole of random Google searches!...)
From YouTube, ignore the music...
Interesting. Got any images or links you can share to illustrate how Yamato did this? (I don't really feel like going down the rabbit hole of random Google searches!...)
The live action movie, done in 2010 I believe...
I love the hell out of that movie.
[Thread Derail]Same here, I own it on Blu-ray. Very faithful to the look of the 70's anime nearly 40 years after the fact.
That simply isn't what anyone has said. You can keep the look and use modern production techniques. There is simply nothing wrong with the designs.
I would like a balance between the two and see what is acceptable change and what is not.The fans who think we should change almost anything and everything because "kewl" and "modern" are just as bad as those who want nothing to ever change because they don't like evolution.
Which is why they should have just gone with an newly rendered model of the ship we've seen on TOS in that time period for 50+ years. I don't get how they were worried about 'nostalgia' as even with the new model, there WILL ALWAYS be a nostalgic element because it's a ship containing at least one character most people know about or have heard about (Spock) for the past 50+ years.The prevailing opinions seem to be that the Enterprise was changed too much or she wasn't changed enough, and that said changes were far too derivative of what online fans have been posting for years. Too much like Gabriel Koerner. Not far enough. The design is just lazy. It wasn't bold enough and needed more Kelvin timeline design touches because TOS is dated and sucks. Most of her is fine except for the nacelles. Most of her is terrible because she doesn't look enough like all the other starships on DSC.
You can't win for losing no matter which side you're on.
You can't win for losing no matter which side you're on.
Welcome to fandom.The prevailing opinions seem to be that the Enterprise was changed too much or she wasn't changed enough, and that said changes were far too derivative of what online fans have been posting for years. Too much like Gabriel Koerner. Not far enough. The design is just lazy. It wasn't bold enough and needed more Kelvin timeline design touches because TOS is dated and sucks. Most of her is fine except for the nacelles. Most of her is terrible because she doesn't look enough like all the other starships on DSC.
You can't win for losing no matter which side you're on.
And the accusations of fanwank would have increased by ten fold.Which is why they should have just gone with an newly rendered model of the ship we've seen on TOS in that time period for 50+ years. I don't get how they were worried about 'nostalgia' as even with the new model, there WILL ALWAYS be a nostalgic element because it's a ship containing at least one character most people know about or have heard about (Spock) for the past 50+ years.
Yeah, the damn black light poster lighting in this show sucks. The bridges aren't well-lit, space is too dark even for Star Trek space and it seems Starfleet keeps all the lights turned down because of budget cuts or something. We get it. Dark. Murky. Somber. Moody. Wartime. Edgy. Cool. "The way the hip kids like it."
Just stop.
Turn up the lights.
A thought I've been batting around, would it have been better if this show were set in the 25th century?
And here! But then I'm a closet weeaboo so it goes without saying.Same here,
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.