I think it'd be less taboo then you'd think being that people have gotten used to the concept. It would be like trying to buy pornography in the 80s would feel taboo, but now 14 year Olds have it on there phones. It just becomes an unspoken norm.
I've never seen replicators in the holodeck.
That's because the holodeck itself IS a replicator. Just one big enough to walk into.
And there would be no reason for food eaten in a holodeck program to be holographic, anyway. No one would ever simulate their favorite restaurant if they couldn't eat actual food while using the program! If you knew the food you just ate would disappear from your stomach as soon as you left, there'd be no point to it. So logically speaking, holodeck food MUST be replicated.
But if other people can actually simulate you, on the holodeck, that's a whole 'nother bag of snakes. Especially if they're using that version of "you" for sex.
Ideally, there would be some kind of regulation that says you can't simulate another person without their consent. I don't care if it's only a holo-you, I'd wager most people would think they have the right to know if they're being simulated.
I mean, if somebody was using you as a sex toy in a holodeck program, you'd want to know about it, right?
But, they've evolved, so does that mean their need to fill every base impulse has evolved as well?I doubt it's just people who can't attract their own human partners who go to the holodeck to have sex. With an option like the holodeck it's probably used as a surrogate on long assignments or a safe alternative to a one night stand with a stranger you picked up at a bar. Couples probably use it as a marital aid, like advanced roleplaying.
Let's be honest here. What's the majority of traffic on the internet? Do you think the human race could really put aside its aggressive, hostile nature if it didn't have a really good outlet for its caveman impulses?
You have been paying attention to Commander Riker, right? if he didn't have base impulses he would be completely devoid of any personality or character motivation. Riker is one who largely got entirely the wrong message from "Too boldly go where no man has gone before!"But, they've evolved, so does that mean their need to fill every base impulse has evolved as well?
Porn does not exist in the 24th centurywith holograms?
If so, do they make sure the computer doesn't record the activity and that safeties are online?
on a related note I've seen episodes where people 'eat' holographic food. How does that work? It can't be very filling
Obviously the definition of "porn" would change...even if run by an AI within a simulation it's still technically porn.Porn doesn't need to exist in the 24th century. They have holodecks.
Think about it. Once the first rudimentary holodeck is invented (some say it has - the Oculus Rift and similar hardware) the first thing someone is going to program it to simulate is their favorite actor/actress/singer/whatever stripping for them, and then giving them a handjob. The porn industry already makes choose-your-adventure DVDs. Using holographic versions of mainstream performers instead of pornstars is the next step after making said choose-your-adventure in 3D.
This actually is covered in Hollow Pursuits:The only question I'd have is, are users allowed to simulate other, real people without that person's knowledge or consent. (Barclay managed it in "Hollow Pursuits" but that may be because he's a Starfleet officer and probably knows how to get around any constraints.)
I mean, if somebody was using you as a sex toy in a holodeck program, you'd want to know about it, right? It'd sure creep me way the hell out.![]()
Barclay continued to do this throughout TNG, remember there was a Wild West hooker based on Deanna in A Fistful of Datas, and when Worf found out, Alexander said that was added by Barclay. So not only is Barclay still creating holograms based on the crew, he's doing it in a program he must know there's a good chance the ship's chief of security is going to see, not the actions of someone doing something against regulations. Indeed, even on Voyager when Barclay was caught hanging out with holograms based on real people by an admiral, the admiral was only disturbed one of the holograms was based on his son, not by the fact Barclay was doing it. So no, there are no rules against creating holographic versions of real people, and presumably it wouldn't matter if you did use these holograms for sexual purposes.Riker: This is a violation of protocol. Crewmembers should not be simulated in the holodeck.
Geordi: Commander, I don't think there's any regulation against-
Riker: Well there ought to be.
Which is a sad commentary on the character then. Also, you missed my larger point that was asking if every base impulse was to satisfied or if some had been evolved past? That's my question.You have been paying attention to Commander Riker, right? if he didn't have base impulses he would be completely devoid of any personality or character motivation. Riker is one who largely got entirely the wrong message from "Too boldly go where no man has gone before!"
Oh, that's an interesting point. I had forgotten about Barclay's lab in VOY.This actually is covered in Hollow Pursuits:
Barclay continued to do this throughout TNG, remember there was a Wild West hooker based on Deanna in A Fistful of Datas, and when Worf found out, Alexander said that was added by Barclay. So not only is Barclay still creating holograms based on the crew, he's doing it in a program he must know there's a good chance the ship's chief of security is going to see, not the actions of someone doing something against regulations. Indeed, even on Voyager when Barclay was caught hanging out with holograms based on real people by an admiral, the admiral was only disturbed one of the holograms was based on his son, not by the fact Barclay was doing it. So no, there are no rules against creating holographic versions of real people, and presumably it wouldn't matter if you did use these holograms for sexual purposes.
This would be the focus group I'd want to be a part of.
Indeed, you raise another very strong reason to avoid using HoloCharacters for sexual gratification And also, the U.S.S. Enterprise-D is a government vessel. I simply cannot imagine a sponsoring government like the Federation authorising its holofacilities to encourage and engage - directly - in sexual encounters with its holocharacters. What I can see being sanctioned are romantic, or even fetishistic settings - both indoors and outdoors. Like certain Honeymoon Suites you'll find at expensive hotels, around the world, sometimes. Simulations of tropical islands like Hawaii, and so-forth. The understanding, of course, is that yes, Starfleet personal are going to have sex with eachother in these environs, most likely. But for the Federation to act as a sort of Institutional Pimp, that's extremely hard for me to accept and if I were a producer of the show, I would fight very hard against that.It gets even weirder and more ethically disturbing. How many times in Star Trek have Holograms become sentient? I can count three from three different shows just off the top of my head. Moriarty. The Doctor, and Vic Fontaine. Now extend that thought out to Barkley's Holo Hookers of his fellow crewmates. Or Geordie's infatuation with his Lea Brahm's hologram? They are creating holo sex replicas of real people, who have the possibility of independent sentience. Then using them for sexual gratification.
Indeed, you raise another very strong reason to avoid using HoloCharacters for sexual gratification And also, the U.S.S. Enterprise-D is a government vessel. I simply cannot imagine a sponsoring government like the Federation authorising its holofacilities to encourage and engage - directly - in sexual encounters. What I can see being sanctioned are romantic, or even fetishistic settings - both indoors and outdoors. Like certain Honeymoon Suites you'll find at expensive hotels, around the world, sometimes. Simulations of tropical islands like Hawaii, and so-forth. The understanding, of course, is that yes, Starfleet personal are going to have sex with eachother in these environs, most likely. But for the Federation to act as a sort of Institutional Pimp, that's extremely hard for me to accept and if I were a producer of the show, I would fight very hard against that.
Do so called "cool people" never masturbate?
^Two words: Gene Roddenberry.
I simply cannot imagine a sponsoring government like the Federation authorising its holofacilities to encourage and engage - directly - in sexual encounters with its holocharacters.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.