• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Distant Origin = heavy-handed, insulting propaganda

Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

Look, guys, like I said before if you want to have a debate on the religious stuff vs evolution you need to take it to a more appropriate forum. Start a new thread in Science and Technology or The Neutral Zone.

This thread needs to get back to discussing Star Trek: Voyager or it'll have to be closed.
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

Since Distant Origin is about the conflict between
religious stuff vs evolution
, then this thread should remain here, or Distant Origin should be Fight Clubbed in the Forum FAQ

Rule 1: We do not talk about Distant Origin
Rule 2: We do not talk about Distant Origin...

You can't not talk about it without getting into the issue, unless all you want to talk about are the kewl effects and the dinosaur makeup and how big Seven's tits were that week.
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

Were they bigger than usual? Somehow I now have an image of the make up crew and a bicycle pump....
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

^^ Yes, but there's a difference between having a big religion vs. science debate, and all the baggage it entails, and restricting the discussion only to the debate as it exists within the context of the episode itself. Just as you can discuss religious issues in DS9, as they relate to specific episodes, without launching a huge debate on the merits of religions themselves. That is what we want, and more serious debates on the two can be done elsewhere.
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

Distant origin was season three. No Seven of Nine.

Maybe a shadow of boobies yet to come was cast over this tripe?
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

I think a more important question than boobies is the function served by Engineer Hogan (he who died so that human DNA could be sampled by the dinosaurians).

Does this make him a Hogan Hero?
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

What type of dinosaurs were using their cloaking fields to hide from Voyager crew whilst scanning and observing them?

That's right. They were Doyouthinktheysaurus.
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

That's just terrible.

V is about Dinosaurs from space too. :)

Diane Carey wrote a neat book about Kirk meeting Dinosaurs on prehistoric earth call First frontier.

O. There is an imperical argument against Evolution in Star Trek. Flint was 7 and a half thousand years old and looked just about in line with the same proportions as everyone else in the 23rd century, when it's recorded that most everyone was under 5 foot back then. :)
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

Without commenting on the question of the validity of the theory of evolution, I will say that this episode's biggest sin to me seems to be its *misrepresentation* of how the theory of evolution actually works.

This is best exemplified in the scene on the holodeck when Janeway asks the computer to extrapolate the evolutionary progress of the 65-million-year-old dinosaur over 65 million years. The very nature of this request shows that the episode's creators, as they have demonstrated time and again, don't actually understand evolution. The idea that any given creature has a predictable, pre-programmed evolutionary path is ridiculous, and contrary to the very nature of natural selection.

Evolution is the process whereby generations of living things become better suited to handle whatever environment they find themselves in. It's unpredictable, because it's based on the interaction of living things with their environment. Over tens or hundreds of millions of years, the same ancestor can give rise to radically different descendants.

Take for example the earliest attested ancestor of both humans and dinosaurs, which Janeway has the computer display for her. This one creature would be the ancestor of every modern mammal, bird, and reptile: a few hundred million years of evolution turned its descendants into turtles, ostriches, eagles, housecats, alligators, pandas, human beings, and any number of other animals.

Each of these different species evolved not along some preset evolutionary path, but in response to the environmental pressures they faced, filling different niches that they happened to stumble into based on evolutionary pressures and random mutations. So it would make not sense to ask the computer to "predict the evolutionary change" of this proto-reptile, because the same evolutionary process worked in radically different ways to turn its offspring into every species of mammals, fish, and birds.

It would be like giving a computer a ream of paper and saying, "extrapolate what this ream of paper would look like if someone wrote a novel on it." If five hundred different people wrote a novel on it, it would like like five hundred different things! The idea that our evolution is predictable (also seen in Voyager's "Threshold" and TNG's "The Chase") demonstrates how poor the creators' grasp of our real world scientific understanding of evolution is.
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

So if Brannon can't write about evolution well, then how can a flawed interpretation of evolution be a nix against creationism?
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

^Yeah. Plus when I saw it, I just saw it as an episode. I found it absurd that the Voth evolved from Parasaurolophus. So I never saw it as a credible arguement for evolution. Plus it is just a show, so just sit back, have some popcorn and watch the show.
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

Everyone keeps talking about "evolution" in this thread. I mean, is the argument that terran dinosaurs never existed? Or that terran Dinosaurs couldn't build a society on earth 65 million years ago if some of them were a little smarter than monkeys like we are?
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

I dunno. I agree that evolution is not very easy to predict, but that doesn't mean we can't make some fairly accurate predictions. There are a lot of variables to consider, but if you were to look at human evolution based on the parts we know now, it would be hard to say that we'd have evolved into anything else. That would only occur if the environmental variables were to alter radically from what they were throughout history. If all of the major variables were in that much flux, the whole theory wouldn't really be applicable.
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

Compare...

For millions of years our people have believed that we were the first intelligent beings to evolve in this region of space. The first race. This assumption underlies everything that we hold dear. But that belief has been questioned in recent years, not only by the Circles of Science and Philosophy, but by the common people as well. Lying before you is proof of the Distant Origin theory. These remains demonstrate beyond doubt that we arose elsewhere in this galaxy, that we evolved on a far away planet, and travelled to this space millions of years ago, our true history lost.

to

There are those who believe that life here began out there, far across the universe, with tribes of humans who may have been the forefathers of the Egyptians, or the Toltecs, or the Mayans. That they may have been the architects of the great pyramids, or the lost civilizations of Lemuria or Atlantis. Some believe that there may yet be brothers of man who even now fight to survive somewhere beyond the heavens...

Personally, I saw Doctor who churn out something similar to the Voth when I was 6 or 7, the bible is just irrelevant collateral damage to this issue of ancient civilization on earth predating bible stories.
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

Sisu said:
I think a more important question than boobies is the function served by Engineer Hogan (he who died so that human DNA could be sampled by the dinosaurians).

Does this make him a Hogan Hero?

If he ate a lot of corn in his lifetime, he'd be a Kernel Hogan. ;)
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

Unicron said:
I dunno. I agree that evolution is not very easy to predict, but that doesn't mean we can't make some fairly accurate predictions. There are a lot of variables to consider, but if you were to look at human evolution based on the parts we know now, it would be hard to say that we'd have evolved into anything else. That would only occur if the environmental variables were to alter radically from what they were throughout history. If all of the major variables were in that much flux, the whole theory wouldn't really be applicable.

I'm not quite sure what you mean by "human evolution". If you're talking about the changes humanoids have gone through in the tens of thousands of years that we have been around, then maybe the changes seem somewhat predictable.

But what this episode is talking about is evolution over 65 millions of years, and that is definitively unpredictable. Take human evolution for example. If you traced the path of human evolution backwards 65 million years, you would get a creature called Plesiadapis (Wikipedia it). It was about the size of a squirrel, had eyes on the side of its head like a cow, and had claws and a tail.

This would have been the human ancestor that lived at the same time as the dinosaur that Janeway does the holodeck evolutionary extrapolation on--so, by the show's logic, you could have done the same extrapolation on the plesiadapis, and come up with a human being.

The problem with that is that the plesiadapis is *also* the ancestor of chimpanzees, gorillas, baboons, monkeys, and every other modern primate. 65 million years of evolution could turn that one squirrel sized animal into any one of the modern primates, because there is no one preset path that evolution follows. As populations split and adapt to fill different niches, evolution produces different creations--sometimes radically different.

The situation becomes even more marked if you go back another 20 million years. Somewhere between 100 and 85 million years ago, an animal lived that was the ancestor of ALL mammals--mice, rabbits, cats, dogs, cows, horses, wolves, tiger, monkeys, and human beings. How could the holodeck computer extrapolate what this "supramammal" would have evolved into in 100 million years? The same animal, given different environmental pressures, evolved into lions, lambs, and Woody Allen.

The same would be true of the dinosaur Janeway analyzed on the holodeck. If the dinosaurs hadn't been wiped out by a catastrophic event 65 million years ago, they would doubtless have continued to evolve--and, assuming their line didn't go extinct, they could have thousands or millions of totally different species as their descendants. There is no one correct answer of what they would evolve into, because evolution is all dependent upon the environmental factors that each population happens to face, generation by generation.
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

Dude. The more fanatical fundamentalist god-heads say nothing changes and the fossil records are bunk, oh, and that the earth is only 5000 years old. You can't talk about this "stuff" you're referring to above with out offending them and forcing these people to call you a liar... Which is unfortunately what this thread is about.

Sometimes when people ask me what my religion is, I say "Star Trek" and then I just wig out with furious declarations about how Kirk did this and that, and how Janeway is a false prophet and... I like being godless, and although I don't like offending the nice people who just want to be happy, there are others who try my patience and don't think they're provoking my sense of order.
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

Babaganoosh said:
Sisu said:
I think a more important question than boobies is the function served by Engineer Hogan (he who died so that human DNA could be sampled by the dinosaurians).

Does this make him a Hogan Hero?


:thumbsup:



If he ate a lot of corn in his lifetime, he'd be a Kernel Hogan. ;)
Boooooo, get off the stage!!!! :lol:


:thumbsup:
 
Re: Yep, Here goes..........................................

Akiraprise said:
Look, guys, like I said before if you want to have a debate on the religious stuff vs evolution you need to take it to a more appropriate forum. Start a new thread in Science and Technology or The Neutral Zone.

This thread needs to get back to discussing Star Trek: Voyager or it'll have to be closed.

Brilliant episode that in classic Trek style makes a commentary on the hot issues of the day. ;)

Now if we could only forget the Threshold ever made the light of day that ruins all of the same. :vulcan:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top