I take it you haven't watched The Problem with Apu, otherwise you wouldn't be so dismissive. That or you don't think their (i.e. all of the Indian-Americans featured in it) opinions aren't valid.
Asian Indians don't give a flying crap about Apu. Most of them find him funny. The characters on their own "saas-bahu" TV serials are far worse, transparently stereotypical, than Apu ever was. Paan-chewing, hookah-smoking, corrupt evil shopowners with yellow teeth that hatch schemes to rip people off and make money and abuse their daughters.
I have a lot of Indian friends, and I asked all of them their opinions when this Internet faux-"outrage" erupted. They were literally like "Apu is funny," Apu is the man," "Apu is awesome," "Why do Americans care about this?" and the best one: "NRI's are so lucky to be there, and this is what they complain about? Aren't Indians usually the owners of small stores there anyway?" Yes, yes....they are.
So their opinions should matter just as much, I think.
But the bottom line is this....if Hari Kodabolu thinks that the Simpsons is stale and out of touch, how come it is still culturally-relevant after 30 years? Precisely no one knew who he was before his documentary. Precisely no one will know who he is in 30 years. And EVERY character on The Simpsons is a stereotype. That's the point of the show.
And he wants Apu to evolve, to be a millionaire and an owner of a chain of Kwik-E-Marts.....on a show where Bart is still in the 5th grade, Maggie is still a baby, and Mr. Burns is still alive when he should be 120 by now. The guy ain't very bright.
But he knows how to take advantage of the internet outrage culture for 15 minutes of fame. I'll give him that.
But I'll make him a deal. I'll campaign for the Simpsons to change Apu, if he goes with me to India to force the Hindi film industry to stop portraying white, Arab, Chinese and Korean characters as stereotypes in their movies. Americans, especially. That offends me!
Oh wait...no it doesn't. Because it's pointless to get so easily offended.