Huh, I just realized there's no Sovereign class in that graphic. I mean, if it's TV only, that'd be cool except then of course there's the Connie Refit, which is also movie-exclusive.
Ya know, those designs flow nicely, if you remove the two connies. They are the oddballs of that line up.
Ugh, the Defiant. It really is ugly. Voyager is a great and sleek design.You keep repeating that in every thread. That doesn't make it any more true (it isn't). At this point I'm seriously wondering if it's just a desperate cry for attention?
Wanna' know who's really the oddball in there?
The Defiant. And the Discovery. And the Voyager. You know, those ships not named 'Enterprise'. Because those show a pretty straight forward line of development.
You keep repeating that in every thread. That doesn't make it any more true (it isn't). At this point I'm seriously wondering if it's just a desperate cry for attention?
Wanna' know who's really the oddball in there?
The Defiant. And the Discovery. And the Voyager. You know, those ships not named 'Enterprise'. Because those show a pretty straight forward line of development.
Ugh, the Defiant. It really is ugly. Voyager is a great and sleek design.
You take that back.Ugh, the Defiant. It really is ugly.
No way.You take that back.
Better than the Defiant. I still like the Saucer section far better than the Galaxy, Ambassador or even the Discovery.Have you seen the side view? Sleek and sexy from the side, it is not![]()
I keep repeating it s its true. You can not look at that and honestly say those two do not stick out ( Not for long as we are gonna get a redesign) Just look t how skinny and bare they re net to the others. I do agree the defiant is an oddball as well, but it does flow better.
Elsewhere someone posted some images of the area around the "star" and I agree with them it looks like a habitat enclosed in forces fields.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Its a mobile space station
Respectfully, yes people can say that. I say that. I think they flow just fine from Constitution, to Excelsior, and Ambassador. It may be true to you, but not everyone will see it that way.
Mister Data, could this be a Dyson cylinder?
This may have been asked before, but since Discovery is a prototype shouldn't she have an "NX" designation and not "NCC"? Burnham, who's a seasoned Starfleet officer, seemed completely unfamiliar with the ship in Ep 3.
This may have been asked before, but since Discovery is a prototype shouldn't she have an "NX" designation and not "NCC"? Burnham, who's a seasoned Starfleet officer, seemed completely unfamiliar with the ship in Ep 3.
Its not really a prototype. It and the Glenn were simply refitted to carry out an experiment.
Discovery herself isn't a prototype. Just the spore drive.
Yes, please.I will simply never understand that. Really, I will not. I would like to see this redone when we get the redesign. Heck this would be nice to do many of the hulls we have in. That would be fantastic.
Discovery looks super hideous from this angle. I never want to hear about 'simplistic shapes' of original Connie after this comparison pic. That unseemly stack of boxes called 'Discovery', there is some 'simplistic shapes' for you.
Personally, I'd rather see the Shenzhou or the Gagarin next to the Discovery. But, yeah, it sticks out, in more ways than one.Discovery looks super hideous from this angle. I never want to hear about 'simplistic shapes' of original Connie after this comparison pic. That unseemly stack of boxes called 'Discovery', there is some 'simplistic shapes' for you.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.