No - it honestly doesn't.
The Ares is pretty much a TOS style intrepid class with a joined saucer/hull
No - it honestly doesn't.
Or many of the fan-made TOS Miranda Class designs:
![]()
Does anybody else think part of the design process for the Shenzhou was based on turning a completed design upside down and then modifying it? I
Yep! It was mentioned somewhere that Shenzhou was originally supposed to be inverted, but it was decided to flip it to have the nacelles downward.The same as the Franklin then.
Yep! It was mentioned somewhere that Shenzhou was originally supposed to be inverted, but it was decided to flip it to have the nacelles downward.
The same as the Franklin then.
I believe Roddenberry did this with the Reliant
Yes, some of the Jefferies sketches had the nacelles underneath. Some of those had the nacelles attached to the saucer with no pylons, and the secondary hull attached above, much like the Kelvin.It's a Trek tradition to flip the models. I believe Roddenberry did this with the Reliant, and don't some initial concept sketches of the TOS Enterprise have the nacelles pointing down?
I was told about it months ago. It was mentioned this happened during STLV for the first time in public.Yep! It was mentioned somewhere that Shenzhou was originally supposed to be inverted, but it was decided to flip it to have the nacelles downward.
I read it from the STLV live tweets, during the designers panel. That was it! OK, Man, spill the rest of what you know!I was told about it months ago. It was mentioned this happened during STLV for the first time in public.
I think the Klingon drawing may be mislabeled. This was the concept art for what became the D-4 design, first seen in the Enterprise episode "Unexpected", dating back to 2001. This was not the "Warbird" (GOD I hate that fucking nomenclature being used for anything and everything Klingon and Romulan these days) that appeared in Trek09 which follows along the same general D-7 lines, but markedly different surface detailing and proportions. I much prefer Eaves' D-4 over the "Warbird" anyway.
I think the Klingon drawing may be mislabeled. This was the concept art for what became the D-4 design, first seen in the Enterprise episode "Unexpected", dating back to 2001. This was not the "Warbird" (GOD I hate that fucking nomenclature being used for anything and everything Klingon and Romulan these days) that appeared in Trek09 which follows along the same general D-7 lines, but markedly different surface detailing and proportions. I much prefer Eaves' D-4 over the "Warbird" anyway.
I think this is good design and would be perfectly acceptable TOS era Klingon ship. Call it D6 or D8 or whatever. Certainly far better than the weird things they're using in Discovery (though I reserve my final judgement until I see better pics of those.)
According to Memory-Alpha, Eaves did submit that D-4 design for use in '09, but it wasn't used.
So even Eaves thinks his design style is so interchangeable that the same design could be used a hundred years apart.
Up until DSC, Klingons were using the same Bird of Prey in the 23rd and 24th centuries, and had a 22nd century version whose only real difference is shorter wings.So even Eaves thinks his design style is so interchangeable that the same design could be used a hundred years apart.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.