I'm starting to wonder whether this sort of situation is of a type where, realistically, Starfleet would deny one person the power to make the decision and instead require a tribunal of officers.
Not just because that forces a conversation amongst peers (assuming the people involved have enough character to overlook rank during the proceedings), but because that way no one person has to bear final responsibility for the outcome.
FWIW, I'm with the poster above who stated that they feel the bridge crew's silence with regards to Janeway's actions is a form of complicity. "I saw what was happening and I did nothing." Might have been nice if a follow-up had involved someone (hell, even a redshirt) who was okay with things at the time, but developed enough of a case of guilt over it that they needed to speak their mind, or even leave the ship rather than serve under Janeway.
I liked Kes a little bit less after this episode and her blatantly emotional appeal to Janeway. No idea whether it swayed Janeway's decision, but it makes me deeply uncomfortable.
Not just because that forces a conversation amongst peers (assuming the people involved have enough character to overlook rank during the proceedings), but because that way no one person has to bear final responsibility for the outcome.
FWIW, I'm with the poster above who stated that they feel the bridge crew's silence with regards to Janeway's actions is a form of complicity. "I saw what was happening and I did nothing." Might have been nice if a follow-up had involved someone (hell, even a redshirt) who was okay with things at the time, but developed enough of a case of guilt over it that they needed to speak their mind, or even leave the ship rather than serve under Janeway.
I liked Kes a little bit less after this episode and her blatantly emotional appeal to Janeway. No idea whether it swayed Janeway's decision, but it makes me deeply uncomfortable.