• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Did Janeway Hate Carey?

Hence, I would always lose the game.

But it's the taking part that counts.
 
Many a dame has rolled her eyes at me... just before taking me home to play hide the sausage.

you mean she played with your dogs and left you bitter and horny. that b****.

I almost put what I was confused about but then remembered this is a public forum. I'll pm you later.
 
Last edited:
do people really think Steven Colbert is serious? OT, but I am watching his show in another window. please don't anyone take me too seriously here. really. It's just a forum. I'd really be interested to know how you are in person. when you're all alone with no one to dance for. It could be dull or fascinating. My life? dull. Don't fly out here, gentlemen. *chuckles*
 
10 years back, a memo had to be circulated through the Republican party "Not a Real Republican. Don't trust. It's a trap!" after a few simple republicans wondered why they'd just got shafted in friendly territory.
 
I remeber way back in S1 "Eye of the Needle" she used the argument can't stop the mission that stranded them in the DQ because of the impact they had had in just a few months, but it's perfectly ok for her to bring them home 16 years earlier and never mind the impact they had in those years.

Isn't the difference that the former would entirely eliminate the changes they've already created with no way of those being recreated? At least to my way of thinking, the latter simply means that the Voyager in the timeline we are familiar with is simply leaving the DQ, albeit through a means that wouldn't have naturally presented itself. But I don't believe those 16 extra years of Voyager's interaction were wiped out with this denouement. That timeline still occurred, it didn't simply cease to exist because of the Admiral's actions. Everything in it remained the same except no more Admiral Janeway and one pissed off Klingon bigwig wannabe. I know this is absolutely a fundamental reasoning of temporal mechanics that a lot of people don't agree with, but I think that it's always been my take on the scenario. Isn't it backed up by what Relativity's crew was responsible for doing, in part anyway? That is cleaning up the messes left behind by incursions. If those incursions always wiped out the alternate timeline, then what would be the concern about needing to deal with that task at all?
 
The City on the edge of Tomorrow showed us a planet that was temporally shielded from even incredibly violent changes to the timeline like Earth not being a galactic player.

If 29th century Earth isn't shielded from temporal revision enough that any one living there can't survive the murder of their own grandparents as babies, then they are not a Temporal Power.

As Earth sits their static, observing the rest of the Universe constantly flaring between utopia and dystopia, every time some asshole who does not know what he, she or it is doing thinks that they have invented time travel, or some vaginalforehead who actually knows what they are doing tries something underhanded.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top