And according to the film, it is explicitly not the same as Nero's entry point, since they had to calculate the coordinates to get there ( as opposed to simply looking them up ).
Except for that annoying fact, we never see Spock and Nero interact, and thus Spock never tells Nero of the full scale of Vulcan psionics, but eh.
Right, because that's the only way a Romulan would know anything about Vulcans... if Spock, and only Spock, told him.![]()
No, it isn't.
I guess it's just my word against yours... or not.
Still just wishful thinking.
Except that there's not a single hint anywhere where Spock emerged
It's becoming increasingly clear that "there's not a single hint" in basher parlance usually translates to "explicitly stated in the film".
unless you want to count Kirk's "deduction", but then Kirk's deduction nowhere says anything about the place where Spock emerged, and as a result the "deduction" makes no friggin' sense whatsoever.
It's not dependent on your failed assumption of spatial proximity in order for it to make sense.
You just spent your time trying to convince everyone Spock is the one who told Nero everything about Vulcans and the full-scale of the psionics.
In fact, nobody makes an assumption on proximity, except maybe Kirk - without ever saying so - which would be the massive failure.
Right, which if you were correct, you would have named the scene and the quoted the dialog in it... since you can't, because it doesn't exist...
Except of course that it isn't, once again seeing no quotes.
You just spent your time trying to convince everyone Spock is the one who told Nero everything about Vulcans and the full-scale of the psionics.
No, that didn't happen. You seem to be hallucinating.
In fact, nobody makes an assumption on proximity, except maybe Kirk - without ever saying so - which would be the massive failure.
Kirk makes no assumption about proximity whatsoever, that's where the "without saying so"part comes in.
Right, which if you were correct, you would have named the scene and the quoted the dialog in it... since you can't, because it doesn't exist...
You mean the dialogue that's being alluded to at the top of the page? Try actually watching the film or reading the thread before disputing something which you know nothing about.
Nope, not at all, but then, we seem to be the only ones who actually know what happened in the movie, unlike you.
So, let me quote from the first twenty seconds of the movie, before Narada has even arrived: "Could this be Klingon?"
You don't wonder if it's Klingon, if you're nowhere near the Klingons.
The first white hole opened 75,000 kilometers away from the Klingon border.
That means it's well inside the Neutral Zone.
The first white hole opened 75,000 kilometers away from the Klingon border.
That was never said.
Oh, it certainly was.
Oh, it certainly was.
No, the figure "75,000 kilometers" was said; the "away from the Klingon border" part was never said.
KELVIN OFFICER: Could this be Klingon?
STARBASE: Negative, lieutenant. You're 75000 kilometers from the Klingon border.
CHEKOV: May I have your attention please? At 22:00, telemetry detected an anomaly in the Neutral Zone. What appeared to be a lightning storm in space.
From the movie:
KELVIN OFFICER: Could this be Klingon?
STARBASE: Negative, lieutenant. You're 75000 kilometers from the Klingon border.
The co-ordinantes mentioned by Nero could easily have been temporal co-ordinates.
From the movie:
KELVIN OFFICER: Could this be Klingon?
STARBASE: Negative, lieutenant. You're 75000 kilometers from the Klingon border.
In the early version of the script the stated distance is from the border of the KNZ, not the border of Klingon territory. In other words they're in Federation space.
From the movie:
KELVIN OFFICER: Could this be Klingon?
STARBASE: Negative, lieutenant. You're 75000 kilometers from the Klingon border.
In the early version of the script the stated distance is from the border of the KNZ, not the border of Klingon territory. In other words they're in Federation space.
He said the same thing to Young Spock too, remember? And he explained to Pike that the purpose of his "seeing" it was so that all surviving Vulcans would feel the anguish that he felt when Romulus was destroyed.Right. Nero wanted Spock to see the destruction of Vulcan... so he put him somewhere where he can't see it. Makes total sense.
Nero knows all about Vulcans and their "intrepid" powers... as anyone following the thread would already know.
Except,
a. there's not a single hint that he does.
b. Nero didn't say he wanted Spock to sense the destruction with his mind voodoo, he said he wanted Spock to SEE it.
Indeed. He's a pretty workable villain, all things considered, but he aint exactly a Mensa candidate.Only if Nero is a complete idiot...
Okay, it's a possibility.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.