That bit didn't work for me, because there was no in-story reason for Robin to point out the holey rusted metal. It was too forced to be funny.
It was a silly gimmick in a bad movie. I'm ok with it.
That bit didn't work for me, because there was no in-story reason for Robin to point out the holey rusted metal. It was too forced to be funny.
And this scene?But what about the "Bat Shark Repellant?"
It was a silly gimmick in a bad movie. I'm ok with it.
One of the best scenes. Batman's moral quandary is quite palpable.And this scene?
Exactly. I think the gag is stupid, but in a movie as...quality deficient as that it's hard to care.It was a silly gimmick in a bad movie. I'm ok with it.
Exactly. I think the gag is stupid, but in a movie as...quality deficient as that it's hard to care.
The movie is bad, therefore not worth getting in a twist that one specific part of it was also bad.
Silliness is not quality-neutral. There's good silliness that succeeds and bad silliness that falls flat. Working in a "Holy ___" reference in an organic way would've been great, but just having Robin stop and point to the "holey rusted metal" for no reason whatsoever is like turning to the audience and shouting "WE'RE DOING A JOKE NOW." And that is not silly, just bad.
I'm not generally one for profanity, but I've long thought that a good bit would be to have Robin say "Holy s---, Batman!" about something.
But isn't that exactly the point? A movie is the sum of its parts. A bad movie is one where the individual parts fail to work, and this is one of those parts that fail. I don't see the contradiction.
Who said there was a contradiction?
And how does simply saying that I didn't think it worked constitute "getting into a twist?" People online are far too quick to read extreme emotion into casual observations.
IIRC, “Fuck Batman” was uttered on the show by a Robin.2. The recent Titans probably would have done it, and no one woud have been surprised
That's the thing, it's not really something that can be qualified, you both are right in my opinion. In fact, Christopher's stated reason for not liking it, that it was too forced, is just what I found funny about it.And all of this just because I posted something I thought was funny.
Humor is objective, not a given. Christopher didn't like it, I did. There we go.
Easy to do with no context clues.And how does simply saying that I didn't think it worked constitute "getting into a twist?" People online are far too quick to read extreme emotion into casual observations.
Is there a connection here I'm missing with Cows and Cubs?I still think having RObin finally saying "Holy Cow" (which i believe is the "origin" of all other "holy" exclamations, both from Robin and others) would be the REAL funny joke... especially if we pan out to see Gotham playing the Chicago CUbs.
You kept expressing confusion, so I stated my stance on the gag in the simplest way I could think of. I am the one who is 'not getting into a twist' in the statement.And how does simply saying that I didn't think it worked constitute "getting into a twist?" People online are far too quick to read extreme emotion into casual observations.
Yes. I believe the longtime radio play by play announcer for the Cubs (could have been the colour commentator) was known for exclaiming “Holy Cow!” on a regular basis when an exciting play occurred. But I could be mistaken about radio vs TV here.Easy to do with no context clues.
Is there a connection here I'm missing with Cows and Cubs?
Harry Caray.Yes. I believe the longtime radio play by play announcer for the Cubs (could have been the colour commentator) was known for exclaiming “Holy Cow!” on a regular basis when an exciting play occurred. But I could be mistaken about radio vs TV here.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.