Oh, I don't doubt that. I just dislike this "trend" ( if that's even the right word ) where apparently real photos are given the AI treatment and they end up looking goofy in that way.
DC Cinematic Universe ( The James Gunn era)
- Thread starter Samurai8472
- Start date
Because plenty of actors have given absolutely fantastic performances where they were just having fun, and not "challenging themselves". If anything I would think an actor would be more likely to give a better performance when they're working their comfort zone, instead of pushing themselves. If they're comfortable they're doing what they do best and know how to do, but if they pushing themselves they're more likely to get in over their head and find themselves in a role they can't handle.
They've already announced The Brave and The Bold which will be introducing the DCU Batman, who will not be Batinson.
Here's the IG post from Momoa's IG page with the Supergirl script
It stops before he actually opens the script, so if you're hoping to get a glimpse of the script's content, you're out of luck.
It's a meaningless, time-wasting controversy delimited by oversimplifications. Actors are workers as well as artists. If they have the choice of what work to do, let them do whatever they want to do and what they as individuals are moved to pursue. The judgment of strangers is trivially unimportant.
Phrases like "pushing outside their comfort zone" are nothing but cant, delivered from the imaginary 30,000 foot view afforded by distant, superficial observation.
Phrases like "pushing outside their comfort zone" are nothing but cant, delivered from the imaginary 30,000 foot view afforded by distant, superficial observation.
David Harbour has a very dry sense of humor and has written, directed and starred in the short film "Frankenstein's Monster's Monster, Frankenstein". So, voicing Eric Frankenstein on Creature Commandos is very much in his comfort zone. But, man, is it a great performance.
Last edited:
Ryan Reynolds: famously breaking out of his comfort zone for the Deadpool films.
You know, if somebody hypothetically had you on 'Ignore', they'd be thinking @JD was responding to me, and reading my statement back through the sarcasm lense makes it sound like David Harbour does a really shitty job on Creature Commandos.
Sean Gunn was interviewed for the latest episode of the DC Studios Showcase podcast, and he confirmed that Weasel's backstory had been planned for a long time. By his account, James told him during the shooting of The Suicide Squad that Weasel had not really killed those children, and when they first talked about doing Creature Commandos, he was given the detailed backstory.
I am pretty sure it's only the "hypothetical" person who won't get the jokes. Because it doesn't come across through text. Sometimes emoji don't even work. [Sarcasm] Maybe we should try coding? [/sarcasm]
Maybe?
It would be too easy to copy+paste the hundreds of hostile posts about Snyder as a person, the films, etc, but that would fill the next 70 pages of this thread...which should be about Gunn's movie, yet the usual suspects could not stop bitching about Snyder and his DC films. That is obsessive hatred, yet they pretend they are not going on and on about it at all. Not hyperbole in the slightest.
Its highly possible from a business standpoint for Zaslav to drop the Supergirl film if Gunn's Superman film is a colossal flop or underperforms in all territories. If the parent film fails to capture a significant audience, it would be foolish to continue to invest in what is more or less a spin-off.
Last edited:
I think this was a fan effort. But yeah, annoying at times.
I'm pretty sure I am on this "hypothetical" person's ignore list since none of my quotes of this person's post have been answered to after I called their "hypothetical" attitude out about a year ago.
Welcome to the club. I first noticed it when he was correcting people in Britain about British accents in Doctor Who and he didn’t reply to my pointing out that Graham was a cockney.
It's a sad thing when one can't take being told they're wrong.
Ex
Also, it could be if he is completely "defeated" he won't acknowledge it out of pride. We'll see if he responds now?
I thought i was too, but he apparently replied to something recently.
Also, it could be if he is completely "defeated" he won't acknowledge it out of pride. We'll see if he responds now?
“I’ve wasted enough time replying to you, I’m done”, is usually the go-to.Also, it could be if he is completely "defeated" he won't acknowledge it out of pride. We'll see if he responds now?
Has he ever admitted to being wrong? I mean, he points out when WE are wrong in apparently misinterpreting what he said, though someone else usually chimes in that they do NOT see things the hypotetical way, ut rather the other person.
If this is the person I think it is, then I stopped posting on the board for a few years as they'd made it a less enjoyable place to be. My opinion, whatever it was, would undoubtedly be wrong and theirs would be right.
Similar threads
