Fox or not, X-Men and Sony's Spider-Man basically started the gold rush of comicbook movies, and I am grateful for that.Legend has it that he was responsible for both the best and worst lines of dialogue in the first X-Men movie.
Fox or not, X-Men and Sony's Spider-Man basically started the gold rush of comicbook movies, and I am grateful for that.Legend has it that he was responsible for both the best and worst lines of dialogue in the first X-Men movie.
Gunn debunked that with his own tweet later.Looks like trailer coming for Superman the week of the 16th...
https://comicbookmovie.com/superman...nd-nicolas-hoults-imposing-lex-luthor-a214890James Gunn said:I don't think we've ever seen the big science fiction Silver Age Superman aspects that we have in our movie. We've never seen...you'll see when the movie comes out, but we've never seen this specific part of Superman's life.
I don't think we've ever seen the Lex that [Nicolas Hoult] is. Nic is imposing. You go, "Oh, fuck, poor Superman." That's the thing we never see, not in film. Sometimes in the comics you go, "Oh, Superman is fucked because Lex is so smart and so good at what he's doing" but in the movies, you're going, "Lex is about to get fucked."
We've got a big old Superman and a pretty tall Lex too. You see now where Lex is, he's not the person you want to have against you.
I think it should be possible to take elements from the Silver Age and couple them with different character dynamics to produce something other than a regressive story structure. I'm hoping that's what will happen with the FF movie over at Marvel as well. I like a lot of the sci-fi concepts from the Silver Age but they could certainly use some updating plot and characterization-wise.Re: the above -- I'm going to take a wait-and-see posture on the reference to Silver Age sci-fi stuff. I acknowledge the many invaluable contributions those years made to the Superman mythos, but in terms of storytelling, it's not an era I particularly enjoy reading. The promise of an imposing and dangerous Lex Luthor sounds promising, however.
Gunn talked new Superman deets in a recent interview. As quoted by ComicBookMovie.com:
https://comicbookmovie.com/superman...nd-nicolas-hoults-imposing-lex-luthor-a214890
Did you ghost write Gunn's response, Dennis?
I believe he was quoting Cenobyte Bandersnatch.Did you ghost write Gunn's response, Dennis?
The relationship between Lois and Clark will surely suffer by comparison, but if the actors have good chemistry I'm sure they'll be fine.After watching a few episodes of Superman & Lois, Gunn is going to have a tough time. The movie better be great.
S&L does indeed set a high bar. But one of the cool things about Superman as a franchise is how adaptable it is, and how many tones and approaches can be applied successfully. I expect Gunn's Superman will be a very different animal from S&L, but I'm hoping it's great in its own way and on its own terms.After watching a few episodes of Superman & Lois, Gunn is going to have a tough time. The movie better be great.
All I can recall hearing him say is a super-generic, "It's a show everybody likes."Does Gunn ever say anything about Superman & Lois?
Where the FF is concerned, I love the 60s run, but yeah, how Sue was usually written--standing in the background with her hands to her face in a "Oh, my stars!" manner needs to be jettisoned.I think it should be possible to take elements from the Silver Age and couple them with different character dynamics to produce something other than a regressive story structure. I'm hoping that's what will happen with the FF movie over at Marvel as well. I like a lot of the sci-fi concepts from the Silver Age but they could certainly use some updating plot and characterization-wise.
Until the intro of the somewhat bloated Super Family from the the current comics.What I don't think we want or need is a superhero ensemble in a Superman movie.