I also don't care about that. I have no interest in any aspect of any stranger's personal life unless abuse is involved or, as I said previously, they themselves are judgmental or discriminatory assholes.
David Boreanaz admits to cheating
- Thread starter Trubinator
- Start date
I also don't care about that. I have no interest in any aspect of any stranger's personal life unless abuse is involved or, as I said previously, they themselves are judgmental or discriminatory assholes.
Or politicians. They are all that and more.
Well, there is some truth to the old chestnut about "men go out to bars hoping to get lucky. The women KNOW if they're going to get lucky."
So, yeah, I guess there is also that double standard.
Well you are making the assumption that they knew Tiger was married.
I mean I knew who Tiger Woods was, but until his car accident, I had no idea the man was married.
Take all the Sports I watch and all the film and tv I watch, I know the marital status of less then 1% of them (and thats being very generous).
The person who cheats always knows their status, the person they cheat with you have no idea.
Actually I have yet to see any statistical data that says women cheat as often as men do. Like I posted earlier the number of women that studies show cheat is climbing, but it still doesn't equal the number of men that studies show cheat.
And again I have seen several studies that show over 50% of the adult men will cheat at some point on their partner.
Dorian's personal experience might make her opinion a little more emotional, but statistics back it up.
Until I see some statistics that prove conclusively that women don't lie, I'm not really going to take studies on a subject such as this as being 100% reliable.
Last edited:
I honestly could care less what David Boreanaz does or does not do in his personal life.
I don't approve of his philandering activities, but why should I care?
I liked him as Angel (on Angel) and I like him as Booth on Bones, but do I have to like HIM as a person? Is it necessary? I don't really think so.
As far as the reports of Men cheating more than Women... those studies are unreliable due to the fact that men and women both do not always report the truth when it comes to their past sexual indiscretions.
To be honest, anytime you're pointing at an experimental research study to PROVE something, you're really just looking for an indication of significance, and even then it's only an indicator of possible behaviors, not a predictor of actual ones.
I don't approve of his philandering activities, but why should I care?
I liked him as Angel (on Angel) and I like him as Booth on Bones, but do I have to like HIM as a person? Is it necessary? I don't really think so.
As far as the reports of Men cheating more than Women... those studies are unreliable due to the fact that men and women both do not always report the truth when it comes to their past sexual indiscretions.
To be honest, anytime you're pointing at an experimental research study to PROVE something, you're really just looking for an indication of significance, and even then it's only an indicator of possible behaviors, not a predictor of actual ones.
The statistics are accurate only because we take people's word as their truth. Men might be more likely to admit or claim it but women are more likely to deny it if only for the social stigma.
Yes they do. But I'm talking about women who knowingly sleep with married men. There is a name for them. Home wreckers.
I find them odd to be honest. Chick flicks seem to glamorous them for some reason.
A Home Wrecker is a woman who knowingly sleeps with a married man. Some are kept in the dark about their man's life. And quite honestly, it is wrong to call her the home wrecker since he's the one who is married and carrying about.
Agreed.
doubleohfive
Fleet Admiral
To be fair, "chick flicks" glamorize a lot of poor male behavior as well, if we're honest.
Ever see Made of Honor? It's My Best Friend's Wedding, with the roles reversed, and yet we're supposed to keep rooting for Patrick Dempsey or Julia Roberts throughout the entire film, despite the fact that their main objectives in each are to break up their best friends before their weddings --and despite the fact that both are persons their best friends have asked to be in said weddings.
We as the audience are supposed to view this as romantic, coupled with the slapstick tomfoolery of it all ... yet Dempsey and Roberts are playing people are just flat-out douchebags, especially in Made of Honor, wherein I suppose somebody realized it was going to be rather difficult to sympathize with Dempsey's womanizing character and they did everything they could with make-up, hair, and wardrobe to summon the image of Cary Grant, who I guess, isn't a douchebag.
The point is though, the coin flips both ways on this subject.
--doubleoh, traded in his XY for an XX for his last gf.
Ever see Made of Honor? It's My Best Friend's Wedding, with the roles reversed, and yet we're supposed to keep rooting for Patrick Dempsey or Julia Roberts throughout the entire film, despite the fact that their main objectives in each are to break up their best friends before their weddings --and despite the fact that both are persons their best friends have asked to be in said weddings.
We as the audience are supposed to view this as romantic, coupled with the slapstick tomfoolery of it all ... yet Dempsey and Roberts are playing people are just flat-out douchebags, especially in Made of Honor, wherein I suppose somebody realized it was going to be rather difficult to sympathize with Dempsey's womanizing character and they did everything they could with make-up, hair, and wardrobe to summon the image of Cary Grant, who I guess, isn't a douchebag.
The point is though, the coin flips both ways on this subject.
--doubleoh, traded in his XY for an XX for his last gf.
Similar threads
