Here's one interpretation I thought up:
September 11, 2001: Khan Noonien Singh is among the first Augments successfully born on one of the most momentous and devastating days in human history; his creators view 9/11 as proof of the need for superior beings.
2030: Khan is elected President of India.
2032: Under Khan's guidance, a large number of Middle Eastern and Asian nations join together and form the Eastern Coalition.
2033-2035: Khan's fellow Augments stage coups in various countries; many of them commit atrocities such as ethnic cleansing and unprovoked attacks on neighbouring countries, causing the UN to declare war on them. Eventually, after many casualties around the globe, the Augments are defeated....save for Khan, who has so far treated his subjects relatively well.
2036: But Khan's peace doesn't last. Seeing the carnage wrought by his brethren elsewhere, the general populace of the ECON nations begins to fear that Khan will one day turn on them. A mass uprising occurs, and Khan is forced to flee. However, the ECON remains in existence, but under normal humans.
This spins out of my thread about Khan started earlier, and asks if the original date of the Eugenics Wars (1992-1996) should be retained, or moved forward into our future. Have your say.
This spins out of my thread about Khan started earlier, and asks if the original date of the Eugenics Wars (1992-1996) should be retained, or moved forward into our future. Have your say.
You still haven't given a decent reason for moving the Eugenics Wars? Other than we've moved past the date in the real world...
If you move the Eugenics Wars... you may as well go ahead and cut Star Trek out of continuity. As it references the 1992-1996 date for the Wars, quite clearly.
The problem with the dates is that World War 3 in Trek Continunity occured in the 2050's, which is inconsistent that World War 3 occured as part of the Eugenics Wars (as stated by Spock), so justifying it as being a conflict that began in 1992, dimmed down in 1996 and was then a small part of the events that occured in World War 3 makes it easier to swallow where Continunity is concerned
SPOCK: ... the six million who died in your first world war, the eleven million who died in your second, the thirty seven million who died in your third.Spock clearly states that the Eugenics Wars were the last of your so-called 'world war' and in Bread and Circuses, he gives us the total dead at 37 million.The problem with the dates is that World War 3 in Trek Continunity occured in the 2050's ...
It's Riker in FC that deliver the figure of 600 million dead for the third world war, Riker in a few episode is shown to have a good grasp of Earth history. It possible that when Spock say "37 million" dead he was remembering (perhaps inaccurately) the death figures for the wrong war. Spock might have been attempting to give the combat deaths of military personnel for the eugenics war.Spock: The mid 1990's was the era of your last so-called World War.
McCoy: The Eugenics Wars.
Spock: Of course.
I like to think of the Eugenics Wars as happening like this
1969: Augments are secretly created in Asia, among them Khan Noonen Singh
SPOCK: ... the six million who died in your first world war, the eleven million who died in your second, the thirty seven million who died in your third.
Problem here is Spock isn't even close. Total killed in WWI was over 16 million and that doesn't include the people kill by the Spanish influenza epidemic that followed. WWII killed well over 70 million (mostly Russian and Chinese). Even if Spock were speaking solely of combat deaths of military personnel, his numbers, and apparently his knowledge, are shallow.
In Space Seed, Spock confuses the eugenic war and the third world war and has to be corrected by McCoy. When speaking off the top of his head, Spock isn't always completely accurate. At least when it comes to Earth history.
Spock: The mid 1990's was the era of your last so-called World War.
McCoy: The Eugenics Wars.
Spock: Of course.
But the larger point is: should it be? I think it should. And any futzing we have to do in order to get it to work out okay is justified.The whole point I've been trying to make all along is that Star Trek's timeline and history is not our own.
But the larger point is: should it be?
Alternatively, we can decide that Star Trek hasn't been our future until JJ Abrams bopped it over into another reality - our reality. We don't know when the Eugenics War happened in the new reality, so we can use whatever date we like, and decide that the new reality is ours at last.
1996 according to canon VOY Future's End episode set in 1996 Earth has no Khan, no World War and no S.S. Botany Bay. Voyager was in orbit and never encountered anything.
1996 according to canon VOY Future's End episode set in 1996 Earth has no Khan, no World War and no S.S. Botany Bay. Voyager was in orbit and never encountered anything.
Don't be so sure... Rain Robinson has a model of a DY-500 on her desk at the observatory.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.