The revived Doctor Who, obviously. More than anything else, Trek lacks audacity and humor. Without that kind of energy another Trek series will fail.
-1 yes minus oneThe revived Doctor Who, obviously. More than anything else, Trek lacks audacity and humor.
I'd rather they didn't. Of all the Stargate colonel's he's my least favourite. I'd rather a Mal Reynolds-style sense of humour.A commanding officer like SG1's Jack O'Neill, he viewed the world in a whimsical way, but could be deadly serious when the occasion called for it.
This is what should be at the core of any new seriesMake the show more character drive, instead of event driven. Have the problem of the week exist, but not constantly in the foreground.
Allow the characters to change over time, I know this is a risk in that they might charge into someone the audience doesn't like. If you look at most of the previous characters, while we find out more about them, they are essentially the same people in the pilot as in the last episode.
![]()
-1 yes minus one
I'd rather they didn't. Of all the Stargate colonel's he's my least favourite. I'd rather a Mal Reynolds-style sense of humour.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.