Here is a good example of negative review that raises some valid points but overall his incredibly OTT picky and histrionic attitude drowns them out:
I won't give away the name of the poster or website it came from, but does anybody agree with his opinions?
To start with, I don't think it was necessary for the Cyberking to be packing extreme starship level firepower when it was only taking over mid 19th century London, while there was no clear explanation what occurred between the Daleks and the Cybermen in the Void (even though telling from "Doomsday" the former vastly outmatched the latter). Can anybody poke holes into his interesting arguments?
I will start of by saying that there was one thing I enjoyed in the episode - the flashbacks.
"Rosita...that's a good name" made me hope that this turned out to be an intelligent episode. The call backs to the previous companions (Rosita=Rose, as well as the story of how she met "her doctor" being the same, John Smith as callback to Martha's shining moments in S3 and "some forget me" being a reference to Donna).
Had they focused on the character work, it would have been a great episode. Tennant acted those parts well, especially when explaining why he didn't travel with companions anymore. "They break your heart" - and that was when I remembered that it is at least his fault that his most important companion of the new series is not around anymore.
Likewise, the rest of the episode seemed logically disconnected and in dire need of a proof writer as well. The same problems that plagued Journey's End are visible here, although less so due to this episode being on a far lesser scale and not being overcrowded with useless characters.
- Cybermen having dreadnoughts and spaceships? Yeah right. Remember these are not the original cybermen (referenced in "Dalek" and looking completely different), so there is no reason they could have had access to plans. Furthermore, wouldn't an original spaceship look more orginal-cybermen-y?
- Cybermen being able to operate Dalek technology. Yeah right. This I believe when a neanderthal cracks NASA's servers and built a Saturn V.
- The Cybermen using children as work force - when they have controllable brutes at their disposal and have the resources to zap people at will...especially when "work force" apparently consisted of shoveling coal and turning switches for ten minutes. Yeah, but they operate Dalek technology and are coal-powered...right. If they can built such a monster, they can also shovel coal for ten minutes.
- The firepower of the Cybermen was pitiful. The giant was firing left and right in rapid succession and at best it set one house on fire with one shot. And that thing was supposed to conquer the earth?
- Furthermore, the plot was completely easy to spot. You immediately noticed that the guy was not the doctor when he pulled out the fake screwdriver and who was not expecting the long talk between the doctor and the villain at the end? YAWN.
Know what makes this even more sad? I watched "Rose" before this. And although "Rose" wasn't the greates premier ever, the drop in quality is noticeable. And I had such high hopes for the new series....
I won't give away the name of the poster or website it came from, but does anybody agree with his opinions?
To start with, I don't think it was necessary for the Cyberking to be packing extreme starship level firepower when it was only taking over mid 19th century London, while there was no clear explanation what occurred between the Daleks and the Cybermen in the Void (even though telling from "Doomsday" the former vastly outmatched the latter). Can anybody poke holes into his interesting arguments?


he had one hit in the 90s. Unless their is something about this im missing.