The romantic comedies that feature stories from the man's point of view are the best; When Harry Met Sally, 40 Year Old Virgin, Swingers, As Good s It Gets, are all good examples.Bale rules out romantic comedy role.
Well, that's at least one major actor who won't be selling out.
^Bale said it first and I agreed with him. The male lead in your average rom-com is a weak character meant only to supplement the female lead.
The last good rom-com was When Harry Met Sally and that was 19 years ago. Since then they've become little more than vehicles for their female stars - especially the cookie cutter movies Jennifer Aniston does.
Clearly you haven't seen Love, Actually.^Maybe I misunderstood him, but my point stands. There has not been a strong male lead role in a romantic comedy for nearly two decades.
^Yes, I have, and I'm not even going to get in to this with someone who thinks Bale is B-List.
Christian Bale is a B-list actor whose been in a TON of shitty movies. He has no cause to be snobby about his work whatsoever. A very average actor on his best day.
Even "Good" romantic comedies are usually cliche-ridden, predictable, and have stereotypical roles. I can't see them as a challenge to actors, so I'd agree with Hermiod about that.
Then you need to see Analyze This and Analyze That to see Robert de Niro holding his own with Billy Crystal.
And it's not true that romantic comedies from "the male POV" are "better" - only that a lot of guys like them better.
No, they haven't. They're just trying to pull a nintendo, and go for "The Expanded Audience".And it's not true that romantic comedies from "the male POV" are "better" - only that a lot of guys like them better.
Despite the occasional aberration (most notably Sex and the City) men still spend more money at the box office than women do, a fact Hollywood has forgotten.
This isn't a new trend, it started about 3 years ago, and sure there are more films and shows aimed towards women than there used to be, but there's plent of shows that aren't gender bias and work. Supernatural, Pushing Daisies, Sarah Connor, for starters. Upcoming just on the beeb, Being Human, Phoo Action, Outcasts, Survivors. There also seems to be a good chunk of American shows, Caprica, Virtuality, Dollhouse, Fringe, Revolution, etc. and these are all just on the SF&F side of things.Sex and the City is just the start. We'll see more female-orientated "blockbusters" in future. There's nothing wrong with that, it's just that the entertainment industry always takes it too far. Instead of going for every market they just go for the new one.
TV is abandoning men in droves and the music industry hasn't cared about men for two decades. Video gaming is still male dominated but the success of the Wii will no doubt lead to imitators. Resident Evil might change things, but at the moment the more traditional games on the Wii have not been its biggest successes.
This is not me saying "stop entertaining women!", of course not, it's me saying "look at me! I've got disposable income!! Entertain me too!"
As I said in Temis' thread about the US Summer TV schedules, with the exception of Stargate: Atlantis there is not one thing I want to watch. Battlestar Galactica and Lost both have definite ends coming up, and then there's Heroes. Aside from spin-offs from existing TV franchises, I just can't see myself watching much in the way of new TV.
I'm certainly not going to let Dollhouse get me all excited. It's a Joss Whedon show on Fox, look what happened last time they tried that idea.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.