Composed and sung, of course, by Ron Wasserman.Aww, and I already had a theme song thought up.
Go, go, Fenris Rangers!
Last edited:
Composed and sung, of course, by Ron Wasserman.Aww, and I already had a theme song thought up.
Go, go, Fenris Rangers!
So I suppose that would make seven the Green Ranger, eh?Aww, and I already had a theme song thought up.
Go, go, Fenris Rangers!
Just because they're owned by CBS doesn't mean they can't print rumours.Having said this, they usually regurgitate stuff that's been printed elsewhere.
I would actually love that title, but I'm sure they'd go with something a bit less obscure for casual viewers... hmmm...If they ever make it, hopefully they wouldn't call it "Star Trek: Seven." That would just be confusing. (as in Star Trek VII)![]()
The Borg don't know how to fight at all. Fucking peasants.I wouldn't call what the Borg do as fighting. It's more like ants going through the motions performing tasks without any individual motives behind it other some basic command from either the Borg Queen or some form of automated root command they follow all the time no matter the circumstances.
So I suppose that would make seven the Green Ranger, eh?![]()
So I suppose that would make seven the Green Ranger, eh?![]()
I would think it's 'cause she's badass (and super-hyped by the fanbase) like Tommy Oliver in MMPR, but YMMV.Are you referring to the plotline or her shirt?![]()
If they ever make it, hopefully they wouldn't call it "Star Trek: Seven." That would just be confusing. (as in Star Trek VII)![]()
If they wanted to make a bit more morally grey Trek show then this would be a massively better concept than the tired and nauseating Section 31.I'd watch a Seven of Nine show. The Fenris Rangers seem pretty interesting. They take matters into their own hands. And it's more Star Trek that's not focused on Starfleet. Branching out is good.
If they wanted to make a bit more morally grey Trek show then this would be a massively better concept than the tired and nauseating Section 31.
Honestly, this seems to be the case. I think of them like the "Gray Company" from Lord of the Rings, who fight and protect the free people's of Middle Earth without concern for politics or borders.I think the Fenris Rangers would be less morally gray than Starfleet in 2399, to be honest. The Fenris Rangers' motives are pure. They come off looking a lot better. They want to help people no one else is helping. Starfleet? They only care about the bottom line.
Yes. But they're probably willing to use underhanded methods. Which comes across as more acceptable for a resource poor paramilitary vigilantes with good intentions than for a space gestapo.I think the Fenris Rangers would be less morally gray than Starfleet in 2399, to be honest. The Fenris Rangers' motives are pure. They come off looking a lot better. They want to help people no one else is helping. Starfleet? They only care about the bottom line.
Neither sounds particularly acceptable. It smacks of "inter arma enim silent leges" in both cases. One just sounds more morally righteous.Yes. But they're probably willing to use underhanded methods. Which comes across as more acceptable for a resource poor paramilitary vigilantes with good intentions than for a space gestapo.
Might as well make a Star Trek: Maquis series with that basis.
Same here. Part of the reason I referenced it is because I think the Maquis were underutilized and still have a lot of potential for storytelling.On that note: Back in the '90s, I wished Voyager would've done more (and better) with the Maquis than they did.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.