I don't like the two Abrams films, but I'm actually excited for BEYOND. Many others actually feel that way too. It's not a stretch.I though peters hated the jjverse. Why would he even want to be at a beyond event in the first place?
Nor, should the producers..........................Alec, I'm lookin' at you. Only quibble I have, Sarge about the actors, pros have to be pd guild minimum.Union rules AFAIKI still don't understand how any "fan-film" can have a budget in the six figures. If it's truly a FAN film, the actors should NOT be paid for their time in front of the camera. Actors can be fans, too, right?
The idea of fairness is very very subjective here. That's why these debates keep raging.
If Paying Tobias was okay, would it have been equally okay to raise 50 million and pay ILM?
Things were moving down a slippery slope even before Axanar started. I know I'm in the minority opinion on that one, but I think people just became way too used to the idea of single productions raising a series of ongoing six-figure crowdfunding campaigns. And I say that as a real genuine fan of Continues. But if something seems too good to be true, it usually is.
BTW, I haven't seen this photo from the fan-event yet. See if you can spot Waldo....
![]()
Generally, it's not some "salary" or daily stipend that drives the cost of screen talent; its travel (airfare) and lodging and food for somewhere on the order of a week.I still don't understand how any "fan-film" can have a budget in the six figures. If it's truly a FAN film, the actors should NOT be paid for their time in front of the camera. Actors can be fans, too, right?
Which is why I said "no pay for time in front of the camera". Paying for travel and such isn't nearly as much as the quote by Tony Todd of $15K per day.Generally, it's not some "salary" or daily stipend that drives the cost of screen talent; its travel (airfare) and lodging and food for somewhere on the order of a week.
Unless plaintiffs officially file to drop the suit it proceeds as scheduled, and makes it look like JJ was talking out his ass.We start with the Scheduling Conference Order. These dates are nothing new, but now we have them in a ruling. Can any of these dates be changed? Sure, but that will require some major reasoning. E. g. if a lead attorney becomes ill, or another case being heard by Gary Klausner (the Axanar case is not the sole matter he is responsible for, not by a long shot) and it goes longer (or shorter) than expected, then the dates could conceivably shuffle around a little. But do not expect it to be easy to change this schedule.
The order gives the upcoming expected dates as follows:
- Last day to motion the Court to add parties or amend complaint is 6/30/2016 – this is going to be, perhaps,the Doe day of reckoning (we had been saying June 8 but it looks like the date is actually the 30th. Our error!).
- Discovery Cut−Off Date: November 2, 2016 – this means depositions and exchanges of documents have to be done before this date. If a substantial number of Doe defendants are added (personally, I think the true inner circle figure is only about a half a dozen people), then this date could conceivably be extended. There would be a small domino effect on the following dates, of course.
- Motion Cut−Off Date (last day to file): November 16, 2016.
- Pretrial Conference: January 9, 2017 at 09:00 AM – this is of course Pacific Standard time.
- Jury Trial (Est. 10−15 days): January 31, 2017 at 09:00 AM – if Doe defendants are added (and they have separate counsel – which they should! There are potentially some rather significant conflicting interests), then not only would the date be rescheduled into the future, the time estimate would also be extended.
For "New Media" productions (Internet and video games and such), there is no SAG-AFTRA minimum (scale). SAG actors are allowed to work for as little pay as they want--unlike TV and movie productions. And there are guild pros throughout the industry of course, not just actors--WGA, DGA, and PGA, to name a couple.Nor, should the producers..........................Alec, I'm lookin' at you. Only quibble I have, Sarge about the actors, pros have to be pd guild minimum.Union rules AFAIK
I see that people have gotten hung up on the "guidelines" part of the minimal statement from CBS. All the statement said was that they are working on guidelines. Not that there will definitely be any, or what they might be.
The most important thing in that statement is that the lawsuit is not being dropped (implied), and is moving right on schedule with settlement talks.
Ms. Jespah has described it all in her blog:
Unless plaintiffs officially file to drop the suit it proceeds as scheduled, and makes it look like JJ was talking out his ass.
The words 'fair use', 'abandonment', and 'waiver' are in the answer.
I have it. Have not done more than skim it yet, but it is 28 pages long and contains a counterclaim and some images of tweets.
Yeah.
I gotta have breakfast and do some work I get paid for first. But the document is in my possession.
The words 'fair use', 'abandonment', and 'waiver' are in the answer.
More to follow ....
In other words, "Second verse, same as the first."Ugh.
I have it. Have not done more than skim it yet, but it is 28 pages long and contains a counterclaim and some images of tweets.
Yeah.
I gotta have breakfast and do some work I get paid for first. But the document is in my possession.
The words 'fair use', 'abandonment', and 'waiver' are in the answer.
More to follow ....
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.