Ummm ... why would he be stalking a girl? You do know David Gerrold is gay, right?
He is ?
Ummm ... why would he be stalking a girl? You do know David Gerrold is gay, right?
Ummm ... why would he be stalking a girl? You do know David Gerrold is gay, right?
I wondered that, too, about the anecdote. A lunch date doesn't have to mean romantic interest, though.
And I am not sure if I would blast Gerrold because he wanted to break some silly convention rule. I mean, I can understand not bugging people with the PA system. But other than that, rules at conventions are made to be broken.![]()
It wasn't him wanting to break a rule, it was his arrogant attitude about getting denied. It's like if a cop pulls you over for speeding and you act like a douche, you may wind up getting a ticket instead of just a warning. Sometimes acting like a douche is worse than a minor infraction.
Nope - didn't then (in 1993) and didn't know until you mentioned it (and personally could care less either way.)Ummm ... why would he be stalking a girl? You do know David Gerrold is gay, right?
He then says, "Do you realize I'm a professional guest of the Convention? I'm David Gerrold [and.he directed me to look at his Badge, and it was as he indicated]; and I wrote one of the most beloved episodes of Star Trek. Do you realize who I am now?"
Or the OP assumed it was a female.....if it's a true and valid recollection Gerrold could have just said "I had a lunch date, and they didn't show, so indeed you to page them."I wondered that, too, about the anecdote. A lunch date doesn't have to mean romantic interest, though.
I honestly recall Mr. Gerrold saying he was meeting a girl; but you're right in that he could have said 'someone' and I internally assumed 'female' because again, what really stuck out was the 'do you know who I am' - and how he wouldn't take a polite 'no, it's for emergencies' and demanded to speak to the person in charge, etc; and was quite upset after she refused as well.Or the OP assumed it was a female.....if it's a true and valid recollection Gerrold could have just said "I had a lunch date, and they didn't show, so indeed you to page them."
Or it's bollocks. Just trying to make it plausible.![]()
Nope - didn't then (in 1993) and didn't know until you mentioned it (and personally could care less either way.)
Very true. But this particular story seems to strongly imply that Gerrold was in heat, and wanted to break some convention rule to satisfy it, lol!![]()
It could just as easily been something that important in a business / professional sense, relating to a career move she could open up for him. He seems the type.
We can blast him for being a douchecanoe about his importance.And I am not sure if I would blast Gerrold because he wanted to break some silly convention rule. I mean, I can understand not bugging people with the PA system. But other than that, rules at conventions are made to be broken.![]()
Can we start calling this case "The Four Months War" and film a documentary with TrekBBS users discussing their interest in the lawsuit?
How is Christian doing?
I read the March(ing) Orders update posted by Diana Kingsbury at Axanar's home page. Apparently Axanar is supposedly about to ship out all the patches they owe donors from 2014/2015 but here's the catch:
"Please note that the patches are the only thing which will be shipping out, as nothing else has been made, yet (and technically, most of the other rewards can’t be created until the movie has been completed!)"
No movie = no perk packages. No apology for all the bad judgement and drama on Alec & Co.'s part, here's your .29¢ patch.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.