• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well the farce continues over at The Hollywood Reporter (including the full motion):

'Star Trek' Fans Want Paramount, CBS to Do Better Job Explaining Franchise to Court

Sounds like Peters is pushing for the whole thing to get thrown out because CBS/Paramount never gave him specific rules to play by... when using their legally owned property to make a fan film... of their legally owned intellectual property.

Their case is built on a foundation of Jello.

From the opening header, "Producers of a crowdfunded film also argue that a copyright lawsuit is 'premature' because the script hasn't even been finalized yet."



(source: https://www.facebook.com/StarTrekAxanar/posts/825596480888210 )

Oh.

Neil
 
They have a script that, by Burnett's own admission, was sent out to agencies for the purposes of casting, so that claim in their defense is, as Uncle Joe might say, malarkey.

EDIT: Also, its further proof that Alec Peters has no clue what he's doing as a writer in Hollywood. "A fully revised, locked script" indeed! :lol:
 
Last edited:
I will see about doing a read today and probably a deeper read over the course of the week and weekend. This may turn into another blog post or maybe a post after the CBS/Paramount response comes in; I'm not sure.

I'll be looking at the cited cases. That is going to take some time.

The interpretations I am seeing upstream on this thread (there's a mixed metaphor for ya) seem reasonable but I want to do my own reading. Either way, if a segment of the defense is that there is no there there, well, this is a set of sworn documents, ain't it?

Which means the AG's office should be rather interested. Donors might want to get in touch. Or call their local investigative crusading reporter (often called a Consumer Affairs Reporter) and ask them to take a peek. Might also want to have a chat with local government. No oversight over crowdfunding is creating this situation. When will it end? Sorry, libertarian mouseketeers, but it may end with governmental oversight.

Be back later. Still going over CSS for class.
 
Which means the AG's office should be rather interested. Donors might want to get in touch. Or call their local investigative crusading reporter (often called a Consumer Affairs Reporter) and ask them to take a peek. Might also want to have a chat with local government. No oversight over crowdfunding is creating this situation. When will it end? Sorry, libertarian mouseketeers, but it may end with governmental oversight.

That's been my sense of it for a month at least. I never imagined Axanar would hand it to them on a platter, though.
 
It is entertaining to see the attempted obfuscation of the docufictional work Prelude to Axanar by characterizing it as a mockumentary. It'll be interesting to see if there is any blowback from this as the process progresses.

And again with the profit rather than personal enrichment. Though I would have hoped that Ranahan would have pointed out and put a stop to the collection of "donations" for Prelude to Axanar as those funds plus the value of all remaining assets from that production can be considered direct enrichment of Peters.
 
I haven't been able to read the entire document either. Can someone point out the part to me where the Defendants claim Axanar was targeted because it was better than Star Trek Beyond?

Neil

Axanar doesn't yet exist as a concrete creative work, and yet it is better than a film the defendants, including the attorneys, have not seen? If that's in the document, its Bill the Cat time.
 
Someday the fine folks at Axanar will learn how the Internet works. :)

63761966.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top