He has alleged a firm is willing to help him pro bono.
He has alleged a firm is willing to help him pro bono.
Just in case you are all tired of reading and want something to listen too, here’s a short video podcast by MundaneMatt.
[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-P7cALWbnM[/yt]
For something that's actually helpful might I offer this instead? Maurice and others can chime in to its accuracy.
[yt]https://youtu.be/H5ZmVheuxpo[/yt]
Fair use is the use of limited amounts of copyrighted material in such a way as to not be an infringement. It is codified at 17 U.S.C. § 107, and states that "the fair use of a copyrighted work ... is not an infringement of copyright." The section lists four factors that must be assessed to determine whether a particular use is fair.
Purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes: Nonprofit educational and noncommercial uses are more likely to be fair use. This does not mean that all nonprofit education and noncommercial uses are fair use or that all commercial uses are not fair. Instead, courts will balance the purpose and character of the use against the other factors below. Additionally, “transformative” uses are more likely to be considered fair. Transformative uses are those that add something new, with a further purpose or different character, and do not substitute for the original use of the work.
Nature of the copyrighted work: Using a more creative or imaginative work (such as a novel, movie, or song) is less likely to support fair use than using a factual work (such as a technical article or news item). In addition, use of an unpublished work is less likely to be considered fair.
Amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole: Courts look at both the quantity and quality of the copyrighted material that was used. Using a large portion of the copyrighted work is less likely to be fair use. However, courts have occasionally found use of an entire work to be fair use, and in other contexts, using even a small amount of a copyrighted work was determined not to be fair use because the selection was an important part—or the “heart”—of the work.
Effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work: Here, courts review whether, and to what extent, the unlicensed use harms the existing or future market for the copyright owner’s original work. In assessing this factor, courts consider whether the use is hurting the current market for the original work (for example, by displacing sales of the original) and/or whether the use could cause substantial harm if it were to become widespread.
Just in case you are all tired of reading and want something to listen too, here’s a short video podcast by MundaneMatt.
[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-P7cALWbnM[/yt]
I know you mean well, but MundaneMatt is the worst possible person to cover, well, anything. I've watched him butcher summaries written in plain English.
Anyone here wanna speculate how someone could argue Axanar as being "Transformative"?
This guy:
![]()
What happened to Gossett, anyway?
did have some girl fight with me and defend them then she fought with someone else after I stopped my name is Erika WeirSorry but I think they crossed a line and actions have consequences #LawstandswithCBS
Well maybe if CBS actually bothered to make Star Trek TV series instead of inane reality shows then this may not have happened, or the very talented people behind Axanar would have been able to create this with much higher budgets.
why is it too much to ask to see a good sci-fi film that is about more than rayguns and explosions? That is why I liked the Axanar project. I want to see a good story.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.