Maybe he's broke too.
Kor
Without a shred of evidence, I tend to believe he has made much more than $5,000.
Maybe he's broke too.
Kor
Yes, but the Indiegogo books haven't been released for the $574,000 raised in that campaign so we don't know who was paid what from August 1st, 2015 to present.But according to the Axanar report, Burnett has only made $5,000 for his work thus far.![]()
It will be a short film contest that cbs_paramount sponsored and decided what gets seenBurnett's argument is that Paramount (through its licensee, Pocket Books) was inducing people to write Star Trek stories because of Strange New Worlds, which he interprets to mean they were encouraging fan fiction. Strange New Worlds wasn't fan fiction. Strange New Worlds was, essentially, an open call anthology for unpublished authors. Most anthologies, especially open call anthologies, don't involve licenses because there are more layers of work due to corporate ownership and approvals. Pocket decided to give it a try, they received Paramount's permission to give it a try, they developed answers to the various problems a project like this would engender. There were submission guidelines, things that could and could not be done, just as you'd expect for any anthology. For the stories selected for the anthology, the writers signed contracts and were paid. It was a professional market that paid a decent rate (10 cents a word) to writers.
The difference between what the writers of Strange New Worlds did, both the published and the unpublished (and I was one of the unpublished) and what Axanar is doing is that the Strange New Worlds writers had permission of the copyright holder to write their stories, while Axanar has no permission at all. Notice I said "to write their stories"; I said nothing about permission to publish or distribute or monetize their stories. It was Pocket who held the rights to publishing and distributing and monetizing the stories. The rejected stories that didn't make the cut for the published anthology sometimes ended up online, violating copyrights in the same way any other fan fiction story does, but that doesn't mean they were were written as fan fiction as Burnett implies.
I can't even imagine how a "Strange New Worlds, but for film" would function.
If he had all of those businesses and made $16M selling one of them, then why would he even need crowdfunding to make Axanar? If he's that successful you'd think he could have just financed the whole thing himself.
Financials for the Axanar Indiegogo were promised in Q1 2016. Still waiting.
Interesting article about non profits (not that Axanar is, was or ever will be a non profit) just...thought it was interesting
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-mariotti/how-to-spot-financial-fra_b_5675873.html
That's a great article, thanks!
(they have a non-legal right to do so)
They just can't help themselves. Even though its true, they just have to glom on to other people's success.
![]()
Did he mention Horizon at all or just brag about how Tommy Kraft worked on Axanar?They just can't help themselves. Even though its true, they just have to glom on to other people's success.
![]()
Did he mention Horizon at all or just brag about how Tommy Kraft worked on Axanar?
I know what you mean, it's not like they went and hired the guy who wrote and or directed the three of the most popular Trek movies to work on the new series....... oh wait.
The guy is unbelievable. I love how just has to bring up all of his business experience even though it sounds like it has nothing to do with their conversation there.
If he had all of those businesses and made $16M selling one of them, then why would he even need crowdfunding to make Axanar? If he's that successful you'd think he could have just financed the whole thing himself.
^^^ This! Both posts QFT.^ This. Exactly. He is not what he protrays himself to be. He is a bankrupted businessman with several failed businesses behind him. He brags and brags, and belittles anyone who questions him. He wonders why people "stalk" him around the web. It's because some people care that others aren't taken in by him, believe his bull, and lose money backing him. He's a bully and a fabricator, folks. Caveat Emptor.
For those of you who don't want to wade through it:
"How to spot financial fraud in a non profit: 2 warning signs"
Sign #1 You can't get financial data
Sign #2 Bullying behavior by management
They just can't help themselves. Even though its true, they just have to glom on to other people's success.
![]()
Tommy actually shared what his interactions were with Axanar (confirming what Burnett says, more or less) ...
From http://1701news.com/node/1012/one-man-band-trek-fan-film-eyes-feb-28-premiere.html ...
Kraft, like many fan film producers, is well aware of that lawsuit, and is even aware of "Axanar." In fact, he did green screen work for a short related to that production, "Prelude to Axanar," which also is the subject of a lawsuit.
...
Yet, one could argue that if it's about quality, "Star Trek: Horizon" should be at the very top of the CBS and Paramount hit-list. Yet it isn't.
"I can't really speak for them," Kraft said of the "Axanar" production. "But it feels much more business-driven than it does with any of the other fan projects out there. And I think that's where the lines start to get blurred."
Kraft hasn't had much communication with "Axanar" since finishing his work on "Prelude," although Peters did give the "Horizon" crowdfunding project two years ago his endorsement. But since learning of the details of the infringement complaint filed by CBS and Paramount, Kraft does understand where the two studios are coming from.
"They are billing themselves as the only professional independent Star Trek production, and you have to ask yourself, could anyone else get away with saying the same thing?" he asked. "Could Twentieth Century Fox come out and say they, too, are going to make an independent Star Trek product? No. They'd be sued faster than 'Axanar' was sued."
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.