• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Burnett's argument is that Paramount (through its licensee, Pocket Books) was inducing people to write Star Trek stories because of Strange New Worlds, which he interprets to mean they were encouraging fan fiction. Strange New Worlds wasn't fan fiction. Strange New Worlds was, essentially, an open call anthology for unpublished authors. Most anthologies, especially open call anthologies, don't involve licenses because there are more layers of work due to corporate ownership and approvals. Pocket decided to give it a try, they received Paramount's permission to give it a try, they developed answers to the various problems a project like this would engender. There were submission guidelines, things that could and could not be done, just as you'd expect for any anthology. For the stories selected for the anthology, the writers signed contracts and were paid. It was a professional market that paid a decent rate (10 cents a word) to writers.

The difference between what the writers of Strange New Worlds did, both the published and the unpublished (and I was one of the unpublished) and what Axanar is doing is that the Strange New Worlds writers had permission of the copyright holder to write their stories, while Axanar has no permission at all. Notice I said "to write their stories"; I said nothing about permission to publish or distribute or monetize their stories. It was Pocket who held the rights to publishing and distributing and monetizing the stories. The rejected stories that didn't make the cut for the published anthology sometimes ended up online, violating copyrights in the same way any other fan fiction story does, but that doesn't mean they were were written as fan fiction as Burnett implies.

I can't even imagine how a "Strange New Worlds, but for film" would function.
It will be a short film contest that cbs_paramount sponsored and decided what gets seen
 
If he had all of those businesses and made $16M selling one of them, then why would he even need crowdfunding to make Axanar? If he's that successful you'd think he could have just financed the whole thing himself.

He knows what the wealthy and/or con artists know - you never risk your own money.
 
It's odd to me to see such vehemence, either for or against the fan filmmakers. Paramount/CBS has the right to prevent unauthorized works that use their copyrighted materials, them doing so makes them reasonably self-interested rather than either villainous or awesome. It's not admirable to try to suppress an unofficial work because it might be more liked than the official products although it certainly makes sense to do so.
I'm not really interested in watching fan productions, although it is pretty amazing that some actors have reprised their roles and I think they should be able to do so if it's non-profit (they have a non-legal right to do so), but I love some other fan fiction and don't think the official works are necessarily better.
I think "crowdfunding" in general seems shady (most of the causes seem less than inspiring) and it's interesting how successful it has been.
 
Last edited:
They just can't help themselves. Even though its true, they just have to glom on to other people's success.

12670917_10102660435113657_3371463019603441303_n.jpg
 
Is there a chance Tommy Kraft might have been paid to do all of the virtual environments? His name isn't in the 2015 Annual Report but that's a lot of work to do for free. RMB might have just threw Tommy Kraft under the bus here. Just say'n it'll be really bad if P/CBS find this.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Captured for posterity. :biggrin:

They just can't help themselves. Even though its true, they just have to glom on to other people's success.

12670917_10102660435113657_3371463019603441303_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Did he mention Horizon at all or just brag about how Tommy Kraft worked on Axanar?

To my knowledge, the only time he's mentioned Horizon in the past publicly was when he tried to deflect any criticism leveled toward him about Axanar, most notably after some heated exchanges, (I think) with Michael Hinman and others. Burnett mentions Kraft by name, but only to defend himself by drawing comparison to Tommy not being established in Hollywood the way Burnett (supposedly) is. :shrug:
 
I know what you mean, it's not like they went and hired the guy who wrote and or directed the three of the most popular Trek movies to work on the new series....... oh wait.

The guy is unbelievable. I love how just has to bring up all of his business experience even though it sounds like it has nothing to do with their conversation there.
If he had all of those businesses and made $16M selling one of them, then why would he even need crowdfunding to make Axanar? If he's that successful you'd think he could have just financed the whole thing himself.
^ This. Exactly. He is not what he protrays himself to be. He is a bankrupted businessman with several failed businesses behind him. He brags and brags, and belittles anyone who questions him. He wonders why people "stalk" him around the web. It's because some people care that others aren't taken in by him, believe his bull, and lose money backing him. He's a bully and a fabricator, folks. Caveat Emptor.
^^^ This! Both posts QFT.
 
Last edited:
For those of you who don't want to wade through it:

"How to spot financial fraud in a non profit: 2 warning signs"

Sign #1 You can't get financial data

Sign #2 Bullying behavior by management

another reason why crowdfunding sites should require evidence of bookkeeping practises by projects (as vs say, requests to directly help pay someone's medical expenses). Though even the latter, you gotta wonder how it can survive in the long term without some way to prove what the money was spent on...
 
Last edited:
They just can't help themselves. Even though its true, they just have to glom on to other people's success.

12670917_10102660435113657_3371463019603441303_n.jpg

Tommy actually shared what his interactions were with Axanar (confirming what Burnett says, more or less) ...

From http://1701news.com/node/1012/one-man-band-trek-fan-film-eyes-feb-28-premiere.html ...

Kraft, like many fan film producers, is well aware of that lawsuit, and is even aware of "Axanar." In fact, he did green screen work for a short related to that production, "Prelude to Axanar," which also is the subject of a lawsuit.

...

Yet, one could argue that if it's about quality, "Star Trek: Horizon" should be at the very top of the CBS and Paramount hit-list. Yet it isn't.

"I can't really speak for them," Kraft said of the "Axanar" production. "But it feels much more business-driven than it does with any of the other fan projects out there. And I think that's where the lines start to get blurred."

Kraft hasn't had much communication with "Axanar" since finishing his work on "Prelude," although Peters did give the "Horizon" crowdfunding project two years ago his endorsement. But since learning of the details of the infringement complaint filed by CBS and Paramount, Kraft does understand where the two studios are coming from.

"They are billing themselves as the only professional independent Star Trek production, and you have to ask yourself, could anyone else get away with saying the same thing?" he asked. "Could Twentieth Century Fox come out and say they, too, are going to make an independent Star Trek product? No. They'd be sued faster than 'Axanar' was sued."
 
To clear the air, is it too late to ask him if he got paid on Prelude to Axanar?

Tommy actually shared what his interactions were with Axanar (confirming what Burnett says, more or less) ...

From http://1701news.com/node/1012/one-man-band-trek-fan-film-eyes-feb-28-premiere.html ...

Kraft, like many fan film producers, is well aware of that lawsuit, and is even aware of "Axanar." In fact, he did green screen work for a short related to that production, "Prelude to Axanar," which also is the subject of a lawsuit.

...

Yet, one could argue that if it's about quality, "Star Trek: Horizon" should be at the very top of the CBS and Paramount hit-list. Yet it isn't.

"I can't really speak for them," Kraft said of the "Axanar" production. "But it feels much more business-driven than it does with any of the other fan projects out there. And I think that's where the lines start to get blurred."

Kraft hasn't had much communication with "Axanar" since finishing his work on "Prelude," although Peters did give the "Horizon" crowdfunding project two years ago his endorsement. But since learning of the details of the infringement complaint filed by CBS and Paramount, Kraft does understand where the two studios are coming from.

"They are billing themselves as the only professional independent Star Trek production, and you have to ask yourself, could anyone else get away with saying the same thing?" he asked. "Could Twentieth Century Fox come out and say they, too, are going to make an independent Star Trek product? No. They'd be sued faster than 'Axanar' was sued."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top