Someone else can. I hate to bother people with questions unless I truly intend to do a story on it. And at the moment, I am not working on any story about who got paid or didn't get paid ... so sorry about that.
CBS/Paramount sues to stop Axanar
- Thread starter Richard Baker
- Start date
- Status
Someone else can. I hate to bother people with questions unless I truly intend to do a story on it. And at the moment, I am not working on any story about who got paid or didn't get paid ... so sorry about that.
That is the elephant in the room conceptual distinction Alec Peters doesn't comprehend while being very nasty towards anyone questioning his crossing the line from an amateur fan film to a "professional" income generating film production using IP he's not entitled to. He just doesn't get it, his ego has exceeded his grasp and in the process he's rightfully being sued for his blatant IP violations.
Last edited:
That's cool. Loeb and Loeb can do the questioning for you. 
Someone else can. I hate to bother people with questions unless I truly intend to do a story on it. And at the moment, I am not working on any story about who got paid or didn't get paid ... so sorry about that.
I've no doubt Loeb & Loeb have lots of questions for Alec Peters. Questions AP doesn't want to answer, especially when his answers are recorded on an official court transcript.That's cool. Loeb and Loeb can do the questioning for you.
(No wonder he wants to settle)Personally, I think after he contradicts himself into a corner and runs out of people to throw under the bus, he'll blame everything on Boomer. Should make for some interesting reading.
Last edited:
From the same dude that called Star Trek Axanar "The best Star Trek movie script ever!".
I hope RMB doesn't ever publicly praise a Star Wars filmFrom the same dude that called Star Trek Axanar "The best Star Trek movie script ever!".
Do we know if CBS / Paramount were granted an extension by the judge? Or are we otherwise expecting a reply tomorrow by those parties?
The plaintiffs filed a stipulation wherein the parties had agreed to a continuance to change the response due date to March 11, the reply due date to March 28, and the hearing to April 11. The reason given is that the plaintiffs' lead counsel (that's Jonathan Zavin) is currently working a trial in another matter. There is every reason for the judge to grant this more than reasonable request.
Note: if either side does a lot of stalling, then things could change. But trial lawyers are often busy, and the parties have agreed without a fuss. The judge does not want this motion granted on that kind of an easily surmountable issue.
Podcast is starting in about a half an hour. We will talk about this (and other things; we're rewatching the 50 best episodes as voted on by our listeners). Show notes/blog post from today will be up later and then the YouTube video will be up. Come and join us in the chat room and, as always, thanks for your kind support!
http://www.gandtshow.com/streaming/
http://www.gandtshow.com/streaming/
So at which point in proceedings as presently envisioned might the Does get named?
I wish I knew how to switch players ... I keep getting the opening playing every three minutes. And it's interrupting the live feed. I guess I'll go back to listening to the archived version ...
Click on any of the four icons below the player. I'm playing it fine in Winamp outside from the browser.
I wish I knew how to switch players ... I keep getting the opening playing every three minutes. And it's interrupting the live feed. I guess I'll go back to listening to the archived version ...
All that does is have me download a "playlist," which doesn't work on the player I click.
'Copy the link location' of the Winamp icon, open Winamp, go to 'File', scroll down to 'Play URL' then paste it in. Do the same process if you don't want to use Winamp.
Last edited:
That's way too much work for me to listen to something.
Sorry, I'll just wait for the archived version like I normally do. I was actually up earlier on a Sunday morning, and was hoping to hear the show live. It's a great show, so if you're not listening, then ...
That's way too much work for me to listen to something.
It's a great show, so if you're not listening, then ...
I missed the first hour so I'll be listening to the complete show later on like you. I don't know what they talked about in the first hour but it looks like it was all about the motion to dismiss stuff.
It's Twitter. Does having something interesting to say even enter into it? #coffeetoohotthismorning; #cutebirdatmyfeeder; #loveitwhendogsyawn; #CornFlakesarebestwithabanana.
Last edited:
- Status